IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Banana] Proposed Charter for BANANA WG

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 17 November 2017 05:09 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C3B126B72 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:09:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mMbqZXpEN_Gt for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:09:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9791B128891 for <banana@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:09:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id vAH59oat101305 for <banana@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 06:09:50 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 53584200DBA for <banana@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 06:09:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DB6200DA5 for <banana@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 06:09:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [132.166.84.12] ([132.166.84.12]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id vAH59lKq007555 for <banana@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 06:09:49 +0100
To: banana@ietf.org
References: <0A934354-150E-4E34-8090-9BB94BBB7F61@gmail.com> <B8F7E3C2-8DFF-4777-9AB7-FAE95748E0CC@gmail.com> <90CBCB75-B581-46AB-9145-3355C4A3BD2E@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <732d07f2-4d55-29f5-0f1b-f6cd405825b4@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 06:09:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <90CBCB75-B581-46AB-9145-3355C4A3BD2E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/Ewxe2mcY5UdTb170lm5nhCG_pDA>
Subject: Re: [Banana] Proposed Charter for BANANA WG
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 05:09:55 -0000

Did this banana side meeting happen?

Because in 5gangip side meeting there was some talk about 5G.  5G is 
something claiming very high speeds.  That's achieved through aggregation.

Alex

Le 05/10/2017 à 00:40, Margaret Wasserman a écrit :
> Hi a Suresh,  I won't be in Singapore, but I am happy to participate in a side meeting via video chat, or perhaps we could have one where everyone participates via video chat sooner?
> 
> Margarer
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 4, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Margaret/all,
>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 5:34 PM, Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [Resending to Suresh’s actual address]
>>>
>>> Hi Suresh,
>>>
>>> I think we have reached the point where there are no more constructive comments on the proposed BANANA charter, so I have included the final text below for your consideration.
>>>
>>> There continue to be a small group of people who do not think that this work is necessary, or who don’t think it should be chartered in the IETF for various reasons.
>>> Discussions with those people are not moving towards agreement, so we will have to leave it up to you to decide if we have sufficient interest and support to charter this work in the IETF.
>>
>> I was hoping that the discussions would converge towards some form of agreement regarding the problems to be addressed by the charter, but as you mentioned, this has unfortunately not happened.
>>
>>>
>>> Please let us know whether you are willing to bring this charter to the IESG and IAB for consideration.
>>
>> I have thought about this quite a bit and I do not believe that this charter can be a basis for a successful working group, due to the level of discord that has been apparent through the charter discussion. If you want me to make a decision today, my answer would be no. On the other hand, if you and the persons who opposed this work are willing, I am open to setting up a side meeting in Singapore to see if some kind of middle ground can be reached in going forward.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Suresh
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Banana mailing list
> Banana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email