[beepwg] A couple of features to limit BEEP no reply attack

Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es> Fri, 13 March 2009 11:06 UTC

Return-Path: <beepwg-bounces@beepcore.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-beep-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-beep-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39453A6A60 for <ietfarch-beep-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_SAVELE=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MfLczq3NbFf7 for <ietfarch-beep-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hl27.dinaserver.com (hl27.dinaserver.com [82.98.144.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DFB3A694C for <beep-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hl27.dinaserver.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hl27.dinaserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF773781448; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:07:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: beepwg@beepcore.org
Delivered-To: beepwg-lista@hl27.dinaserver.com
Received: from dolphin.aspl.es (unknown [212.170.101.196]) by hl27.dinaserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC77069B688 for <beepwg@beepcore.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:06:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.aspl.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BA16C00A; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:05:13 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dolphin.aspl.es
Received: from dolphin.aspl.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dolphin.aspl.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jBiXaaccxl2P; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:05:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.132] (barracuda [10.0.0.4]) by dolphin.aspl.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101C86C009; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:05:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es>
To: BEEPwg <beepwg@beepcore.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-jFTX1RHkxr17LPWnn4f2"
Organization: Advanced Software Production Line, S.L.
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:06:21 +0100
Message-Id: <1236942381.17324.180.camel@vulcan.aspl.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1
X-DinaScanner: Libre de Virus, Este E-Mail no ha sido analizado.
X-DinaScanner-SpamCheck: no es spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, puntaje=-2.499, requerido 6, BAYES_00 -2.60, RDNS_NONE 0.10),
cc: Vortex <vortex@lists.aspl.es>
Subject: [beepwg] A couple of features to limit BEEP no reply attack
X-BeenThere: beepwg@beepcore.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: <beepwg.beepcore.org>
List-Help: <mailto:beepwg-request@beepcore.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:beepwg@beepcore.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://beepcore.org/mailman/listinfo/beepwg>, <mailto:beepwg-request@beepcore.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://beepcore.org/mailman/listinfo/beepwg>, <mailto:beepwg-request@beepcore.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: beepwg-bounces@beepcore.org
Errors-To: beepwg-bounces@beepcore.org
X-DinaScanner-Information: DinaScanner. Filtro anti-Spam y anti-Virus
X-MailScanner-ID: DF773781448.A182D
X-DinaScanner-From: beepwg-bounces@beepcore.org

Hi,

I've been working on a couple of features that will allow limiting how
BEEP implements some reply requirements that may be used to setup an
attack. 

It would be great to known your opinion about this. 

Cheers!
-- 
Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es>;
Advanced Software Production Line, S.L.