IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] draft-xu-behave-nat-state-sync-00

marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Fri, 13 November 2009 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EDE28C10F for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:25:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.204
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.395, BAYES_00=-2.599, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uj0wel7LRRKF for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:24:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D9F3A6A06 for <behave@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:24:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host-17-49.meeting.ietf.org (host-17-49.meeting.ietf.org [133.93.17.49]) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A915BA89AA; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:25:24 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4AFCC392.6060805@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:25:22 +0100
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: xuxiaohu 41208 <xuxh@huawei.com>
References: <4AFCBC87.20009@gmail.com> <f95edf9c1a277.1a277f95edf9c@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <f95edf9c1a277.1a277f95edf9c@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.0.0.1038-17004.003
Cc: behave@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] draft-xu-behave-nat-state-sync-00
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:25:00 -0000

xuxiaohu 41208 escribió:
> ----- 原邮件 -----
> 发件人: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> 日期: 星期五, 十一月 13日, 2009 上午10:57
> 主题: [BEHAVE] draft-xu-behave-nat-state-sync-00
> 收件人: behave@ietf.org
>
>   
>> My question about this draft is whether there is available code
>> and implementation experience with SCSP, which was defined in 1998.
>>
>> If there isn't code and experience, since it is a quite complex
>> design, I would be a bit worried.
>>     
>
> Reasonable. We are now scheduled to implement it. Once the experiment is done, we will give a report to Behave WG.
>
>   
I understand what Brian is asking is that since the protocol has been
defined over more than 10 years now, whehter there are implementations
out there. If not, then this may mean something.

Regards, marcelo



>> On the other hand, I believe that something of the complexity
>> of SCSP is absolutely required to provide reliable synchronisation.
>> There is no simple, lightweight way to do this reliably.
>>     
>
> Absolutely agree.
>
> Xiaohu
>
>   
>> _______________________________________________
>> Behave mailing list
>> Behave@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email