IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] [v6ops] protocols without need for ALG ?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 31 July 2015 05:11 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB0D1B30EA; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 22:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6QG4UCWv-zHB; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 22:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D59961B30E6; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 22:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id AF1B5A1; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:11:14 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1438319474; bh=kxHgYbmG2zuSoEQHDWzpmu/n2Vs/GeWjDM3rgXUCVjU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TqlkcY4yH2AuY4xSIs9N6G5qqHAlV7fsNoHjfhoCzbkVsjB62Yh8DDNT+702Nh9FM vx5J1NPu6Iy/HHGaPfAQptTNav243Uqkna1YzJTAtJLV6egkmUOZh9T4yMf/Kls5dX 6zhbqcT9sb/rwNtIMs0vDNRmXbFkR8us1y8lx4Go=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64D89F; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:11:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:11:14 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <33A0B18B-5C9D-4DC3-9E0B-736D7ECA404F@delong.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507310706240.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20150730205806.GI1667@cisco.com> <33A0B18B-5C9D-4DC3-9E0B-736D7ECA404F@delong.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/behave/0spwh4KZEEkoOctDsxF8mqo_hhg>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>, behave@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [v6ops] protocols without need for ALG ?
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/behave/>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:11:18 -0000

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Owen DeLong wrote:

>>   SSH/SCP - OK
>>   syslog  - OK
>>   TFTP    - OK ?
>
> Should be OK, depending on which side is client. (client has to be the
> private address/translated side of the connection).

There are ALGs for TFTP from multiple vendors, and I seem to remember I 
had problem performing TFTP download from behind a NAT, but I could be 
mistaken. This should be investigated further.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email