IETF Logo Mail Archive

[BEHAVE] draft-xu-behave-nat-state-sync-00

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 13 November 2009 01:55 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC80A3A698F for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:55:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4UgF472rZMzC for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f183.google.com (mail-yw0-f183.google.com [209.85.211.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CF53A6966 for <behave@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywh13 with SMTP id 13so3245545ywh.29 for <behave@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:55:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wZdXfyHp4W3/pRF+RZOgdb4YxuKSc7IqOPAnf7it0Tg=; b=spa/LDFZjPiqj+e3k3QsY4xohLXxFZeaOlXhF1rjcPhCzM5/MjTtxktHavWXCx0mH2 tQ7Rk9iYKIOIEXei6qenCa3cZiGkKrSee1zGIN00JQ+1AwHsJ0C0hKnPPWBLAQ5pJD2T e5NAntcsupHU13cpwK1K9MUkkDbzAKmOR4gsw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FrNIUsUUvwoPW8KHsk4kW74Mx1CcVVhy5PUT5hrEFIvx19K9SXkh5FAceCiCBx9SYq lQUddf7bmYRY06ZSBQeUenKWgVWBNCrmWgAXX44LuHktFVOE/etCJKZtdW7PcBm5GjTL t1c4sC7rD6TkKnIEq+4kVAyxqCsy5PSofTIk4=
Received: by 10.150.250.29 with SMTP id x29mr6654052ybh.150.1258077327413; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:55:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?133.93.16.203? (host-16-203.meeting.ietf.org [133.93.16.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm516333gxk.7.2009.11.12.17.55.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4AFCBC87.20009@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:55:19 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: behave@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [BEHAVE] draft-xu-behave-nat-state-sync-00
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:55:03 -0000

My question about this draft is whether there is available code
and implementation experience with SCSP, which was defined in 1998.

If there isn't code and experience, since it is a quite complex
design, I would be a bit worried.

On the other hand, I believe that something of the complexity
of SCSP is absolutely required to provide reliable synchronisation.
There is no simple, lightweight way to do this reliably.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email