[BEHAVE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5769 (4776)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 12 August 2016 00:58 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1986512D906 for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id THw4ylo1w9nC for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CBEA12D8F3 for <behave@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0E5D2B80ACA; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@kuehlewind.net, dwing@cisco.com, dthaler@microsoft.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160812005838.0E5D2B80ACA@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:58:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/behave/3i0yjKI66hbBiN2qRHzHHHCnbQM>
Cc: behave@ietf.org, block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [BEHAVE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5769 (4776)
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/behave/>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:58:40 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5769, "Test Vectors for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5769&eid=4776 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: software should include manufacturer and version number <block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com> Section: 2 Original Text ------------- 2.1. Sample Request This request uses the following parameters: Software name: "STUN test client" (without quotes) Corrected Text -------------- 2.1. Sample Request This request uses the following parameters: Software name: "STUN-test-client@v0.0.0" (without quotes) Notes ----- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5389#section-15.10 says that Its value SHOULD include manufacturer and version number. so test vector of SOFTWARE at 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 should include this. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5769 (draft-ietf-behave-stun-test-vectors-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Test Vectors for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Publication Date : April 2010 Author(s) : R. Denis-Courmont Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [BEHAVE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5769 (477… RFC Errata System