IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] [v6ops] protocols without need for ALG ?

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Fri, 31 July 2015 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1221A1A5F; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VkvdnM5RVmZA; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E2D1A1A57; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) with ESMTP id 0d76bb55.2b9bd4c4d940.2190269.00-2461.6234745.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <bs7652@att.com>); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:19:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 55bb67d010a9f991-70a57acb5dfee02961f8526b79da2fd264ff67be
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id ac76bb55.0.2190226.00-2146.6234630.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <bs7652@att.com>); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:19:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 55bb67cd011d1b91-0065b5ded2378fdb1adbd1de065454db5b797db8
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6VCJLx7021370; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:19:21 -0400
Received: from alpi133.aldc.att.com (alpi133.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.3]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6VCJBoY021305 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:19:15 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAA.ITServices.sbc.com (GAALPA1MSGHUBAA.itservices.sbc.com [130.8.218.150]) by alpi133.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:19:07 GMT
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.63]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAA.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.150]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:19:07 -0400
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] protocols without need for ALG ?
Thread-Index: AQHQywp70rb1Fq++mESi4PQB2sD9p531f2EA
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:19:06 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61132AC5E09@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <20150730205806.GI1667@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150730205806.GI1667@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.104.205]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=ONaQK1mB c=1 sm=1 a=VXHOiMMwGAwA+y4G3/O+aw==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=BttOa0TPrj8A:10 a=zOBTX]
X-AnalysisOut: [jUuO1YA:10 a=pUsKtR-7xbNaotJVKlgA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2015072901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <bs7652@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.23]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/behave/3rxc5Zvopb6rCFIkKJdxKYG7-Fs>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:16:34 -0700
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [v6ops] protocols without need for ALG ?
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/behave/>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:19:30 -0000

> Wrt to what seems to be important between NOC and network devices:

Is there ever a case where IPsec is used to establish a secure connection to the NOC equipment? I don't know -- I just know that IPsec is one of the most common ALGs around.
Barbara

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email