IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] proprietary implementation v.s standardisedprotocols//re: draft-xu-behave-nat-state-sync-00

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Tue, 01 December 2009 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBE928C12A for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:01:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oHJLIvsPZP58 for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3ED28C127 for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (ringo.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000::67]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F09F521BC1 for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:01:10 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B1559E6.4060003@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:01:10 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090922 Fedora/3.0-3.9.b4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0b4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: behave@ietf.org
References: <bcff0fba0911302332ub498269qabbdca8341b018d5@mail.gmail.com> <002f01ca7265$b6ededb0$d40c6f0a@china.huawei.com> <097401ca72aa$0828aa50$c3f0200a@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <097401ca72aa$0828aa50$c3f0200a@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] proprietary implementation v.s standardisedprotocols//re: draft-xu-behave-nat-state-sync-00
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:01:19 -0000

Dan Wing wrote, on 2009-12-01 12:16:
> It's not just the AAAA records getting cached.  It's also the 
> applications that have done their getaddrinfo() and now have the
> IPv6 address in their internal datastructures.  There is no lifetime
> for that, and very very few applications pay any attention to the
> TTL of the AAAA record.  Applications expect the IPv6 address to 
> be fixed and to be valid as long as they need it.

How hard should NAT64 try to accommodate broken applications?

These applications would fail in many other cases that don't involve NAT64.

Simon
-- 
DNS64 open-source   --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server    --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0           --> http://www.vcarddav.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email