IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] [IANA #831872] Re: Protocol Action: 'Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT))' to Proposed Standard (draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-04.txt)

Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Mon, 13 July 2015 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id DC14D1B2BBD; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFCE1B2BBB for <xfilter-draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.334
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ri0azGP_Jc-t for <xfilter-draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E28A81B2B7C for <draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]:36030) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>) id 1ZEfe3-0004uh-6R for draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:27:51 -0700
Received: by igbij6 with SMTP id ij6so24363117igb.1 for <draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lC6agbd6q2NwkkQKJUlbZCS2TvuVL7dTQ3QT79CCUyI=; b=pplKkldH8pE+qGRK+wozBUYtQy3bk27lRcZiK3I8pXWa9KV2/8W5G9U2cfhVIUuMxa VypPAyfl0rQGr3y+Q9ODaxVsRYW5PZNidSDnHil7KQtqFlosMJwcEUORmCvdw85UKeL7 Dyk+71/QkZ9jVsg5FM/WfrjfovetV7TV82uL9bQnmCALlMnrYvQ5Vi4Kr9IrBo+94Ae0 lmxgge+y9Zb1qU6hB3Al3LXS+Vamu6DtQdChk/f7yyze39JFbntDdUVijnMkPuCLGDbh G+AUniTJIb4wF2A+DsVX42k+KT7K82YSAnmrkHhiXUW+PlvQBebVGxKpJbOsrjqwMCDv jLAg==
X-Received: by 10.50.49.46 with SMTP id r14mr13589947ign.45.1436801263359; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.135] (dsl-173-206-74-97.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.74.97]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rj5sm5899663igc.2.2015.07.13.08.27.42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
References: <RT-Ticket-831872@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-830007@icann.org> <20150624164600.27690.81498.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-9660-1435793159-1016.830007-7-0@icann.org> <5594810A.1040609@gmail.com> <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A818BFB83E@szxeml557-mbs.china.huawei.com> <78FF46EF-42AF-4B12-A255-931596BDC3F0@comcast.net> <rt-4.2.9-8025-1436203452-88.831872-7-0@icann.org> <559AE414.2050001@gmail.com> <373F7664-3D2B-4BE3-9307-6D3D4E19C6CB@comcast.net>
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55A3D8ED.7080208@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:27:41 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <373F7664-3D2B-4BE3-9307-6D3D4E19C6CB@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150713152751.E28A81B2B7C@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:27:51 -0700
Resent-From: tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools/3P-0MeYGtXYLAvp0q6Ss9g7zbBE>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/behave/GbAJDZrwv6lc8QS9fosgDW4Wh-U>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:41:02 -0700
Cc: draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1.all@tools.ietf.org, drafts-approval@iana.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [IANA #831872] Re: Protocol Action: 'Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT))' to Proposed Standard (draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/behave/>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:27:53 -0000

Done in version -06.

Tom

On 13/07/2015 8:38 AM, David Harrington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believe the IANA Considerations should be updated to reflect the deprecation intent.
>
> David Harrington
> ietfdbh@comcast.net
>
>
>
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd go with David as expert: the IANA Considerations section should be updated.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 06/07/2015 1:24 PM, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
>>> Hi David, all,
>>>
>>> The IANA Considerations section says, "IANA is requested to mark that identifier as OBSOLETE and to update the reference from [RFC4008] to the present document."
>>>
>>> Should the IANA Considerations section be updated, or should the MIB be updated?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Amanda
>>>
>>>
...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email