Re: [BEHAVE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6052 (5547)

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 06 November 2018 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4F9124BAA for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 05:52:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFnMNs3iR2UH for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 05:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86E2112D4F1 for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 05:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id u13-v6so6143590pfm.4 for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 05:52:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=t70CURAvU+zAI626Oz3rvwcBjXMOZ1tPhY4Q8BjTyVo=; b=t5ZnDY6ou+p0SVMzvixzYsexz8rwNNHlgRgHvdHqL5qXH95KL6gzy0+hBwKcGoCGNH N6bPiYhX/d9UbGgVeraJO1VjZIX4I/Ac5scPcKD7O6yfpVGRU8U6TSiTnR21JikOBMEs BElJM2q4NhJdhoLm9R+q2r2Vf2a5xuHw4LThxeF8ceLlxWu2s5wuxp5JSjZYr4zkUOrR fGAi7EzxP8PXATqaaijuKYSZa3tdhNa8qEg5bfw+aH2r3a94WbvuDUgRMrePEV073N9m yhAcWxClzus9KbxqO1pLdmmDp0JwWtOhrFFPEfb47q+8CIo3gT75mchHo/wjY8Uol6AZ CsBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=t70CURAvU+zAI626Oz3rvwcBjXMOZ1tPhY4Q8BjTyVo=; b=FwbJeoAeMdqtCiMpyEoM/4uuzwQ3JcTCJsVjLS0VEQwTRnMWE+hxB7uAvcGdAuTsE8 GzUb8Hqs1hZUL0Htnu8ByHEylYheWAeWpVVfIG89OOyJbynMHahNIfiVsAKoNJZOjbkX 3cZL8bp7YHV6SILClh0RVXDgRUAwHTgQQLs0J5/Vc0Ygr5woJLBVVgTDN/cZ7jv9YS1K JGcusT8AvQcepM98jfYutMhhSutTo2lM6UF1vGvQTNw1luKt5QIzJBEupMSQUFWmXf8K 5Wva3lkh8Es6kR7m79TD2ei0RSy/YUQV0veoZKgRfebnasvVkUFy+1fgi+tmsnHah9LC d5aQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJTqPYbMRJrikOpyU41bwJqPL9FXDZ92PQmNNI5lo+9jfZuVJyq tCgC9Lmxclyd3JFcHBioOrA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cjfYxd1W2kXn7Xyr1rrK8EhLUO2CmIKy4+i4bhwUTN8Bexq/lFR00tebzD46PQ7MAC3i+8gw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:8f45:: with SMTP id r5mr4275403pgn.222.1541512354050; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 05:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:9df0:b919:995c:c72b? ([2001:67c:1232:144:9df0:b919:995c:c72b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7-v6sm48226501pgk.31.2018.11.06.05.52.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Nov 2018 05:52:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <FBAAB5CB-2AC4-43B1-A931-15E75662B7EF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_24D1271D-25CB-453A-8DD2-7A8E2DB4E484"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:52:28 +0700
In-Reply-To: <75370789-566F-4187-8374-719E40D59D31@consulintel.es>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Congxiao Bao <congxiao@cernet.edu.cn>, mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn>, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, dwing@cisco.com, huitema@microsoft.com, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, behave@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
References: <20181106085323.07C1BB80008@rfc-editor.org> <27516408-05B3-4C08-B40E-B01E44525AB5@gmail.com> <5a5d6ac6-2d9a-96ee-118d-3601e47804cc@huitema.net> <0F8964C5-7C2F-4C90-854A-D1ADF02D7C08@gmail.com> <75370789-566F-4187-8374-719E40D59D31@consulintel.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/behave/MgTATmzT7A01CTSGg5zCQhqkxA0>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6052 (5547)
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/behave/>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 13:52:36 -0000


> On Nov 6, 2018, at 7:16 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>; wrote:
> 
> The advantage I see with a WKP is that you can roam to another NAT64 (and/or DNS64) without changing configs, and also, that you may ignore the prefix discovery mechanism (I've seen this coded in some places), if you presume that the WKP is the "default" one ...

That, of course, is exactly the problem with RFC 7050. If you are using the preferred resolver, you get one prefix, and if you're using 8.8.8.8 (as many do), you get another. A Well Known Prefix is a great way to pick the wrong one, or one that doesn't exist.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war,
Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
     Sun Tzu