Re: [BEHAVE] BEHAVE status update

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

Hi Dan,

Thanks for the clarity. I do have a couple of questions:

On 2009-02-22 19:22, Dan Wing wrote:
> An update on some of BEHAVE's activities -- IPv4/IPv6 translation, TURN, and
> TURN-TCP:
> 
> IPv4/IPv6 Translation:
> 
>    - Dave recently sent a Doodle poll to help prioritize documents 
>      to adopt.  However, as of Saturday night only 5 people have 
>      replied to this poll.  

I read it as being addressed very specifically to implementors
and operators, which will cut down the response rate.
If you want responses from more people, Q3 ("Have you or are
you planning to deploy...?") would need to be phrased somewhat
differently. Or add a Q4 such as "Do you see a clear operational
requirement for...?".

> 
>      We will meet our milestone "Determine relative 
>      prioritization of the four translation cases" at the
>      San Francisco BEHAVE meeting.

I have the impression that we don't have a current analysis document
about these four scenarios, and reaching a decision just on the basis
of the paragraphs in the charter and a doodle poll seems a bit casual.
Section 1.5 of draft-baker-behave-v4v6-framework-01 does discuss two
cases, with placeholders for two others, but they don't seem to be
quite identical to the cases in the charter. Have I missed a document?

Thanks
     Brian