IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] proprietary implementation v.s standardisedprotocols//re: draft-xu-behave-nat-state-sync-00

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Wed, 02 December 2009 01:52 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A203A6972 for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:52:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mQrDp5orWAJ7 for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:52:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740EA3A6926 for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:52:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balaise.nomis80.org (modemcable245.152-21-96.mc.videotron.ca [96.21.152.245]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A857320E63; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:52:02 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B15C842.902@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:52:02 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090922 Fedora/3.0-3.9.b4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0b4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
References: <003401ca72f1$7d0d0310$d40c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <003401ca72f1$7d0d0310$d40c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: behave@ietf.org, 'Dan Wing' <dwing@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] proprietary implementation v.s standardisedprotocols//re: draft-xu-behave-nat-state-sync-00
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:52:11 -0000

On 12/01/2009 08:48 PM, Xu Xiaohu wrote:
>> On the other hand, #1 is a well
>> understood problem, with a well understood solution, with various proprietary
>> incarnations in use right now (hint! hint!).
> 
> Does that mean a set of NAT64 boxes within a cluster should be from a single
> vendor?

No! I was hinting exactly to the contrary. We should standardize NAT64
state synchronization.

Simon
-- 
DNS64 open-source   --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server    --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0           --> http://www.vcarddav.org

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email