Re: [BEHAVE] [v6ops] protocols without need for ALG ?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 31 July 2015 05:42 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6181B3108; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 22:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GV9U_U6w1g_B; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 22:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D0A31A0354; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 22:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id D6B1AA1; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:42:31 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1438321351; bh=N3VN8oOHYtep4435pX0j2Nz85ZNq9YZLIuVPRtbgMT4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ogUIrf6MZtyH5F7uBg0fzqDEcKnpc1phwBrWOy97rTPZUVJNkPvHCc03OuNcnHIZ7 zJ3hhM1wLCx0aozhiyhQ4yp+c84ekX7g9gBJPzoWMO01ik3r2wv+kSt59dJG857lTJ 7EkcMIYhEJvFLnpTdgRshYq/B5NC8ZFBLmtwMEtk=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8849F; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:42:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:42:31 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <55A144E0-74BE-4A29-9A5F-782D7D660399@delong.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507310741010.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20150730205806.GI1667@cisco.com> <33A0B18B-5C9D-4DC3-9E0B-736D7ECA404F@delong.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507310706240.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se> <55A144E0-74BE-4A29-9A5F-782D7D660399@delong.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-137064504-2013288220-1438321351=:11810"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/behave/kpqXAbYnYDboMXis1-doaA3x98c>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>, behave@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [v6ops] protocols without need for ALG ?
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/behave/>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:42:34 -0000

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Owen DeLong wrote:

> You might need STUN or something like that, but you shouldn’t need an 
> ALG.

Well, if STUN is needed then this should be documented as well. It makes 
the TFTP client more complicated and it would break connectivity for 
legacy devices.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se