Re: [BEHAVE] (no subject)

ivan c <ivan@cacaoweb.org> Wed, 26 June 2013 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ivan@cacaoweb.org>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B84421F9B4B for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tMBKsghBxqDr for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cacaoweb.org (mail.cacaoweb.org [46.105.102.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290E621F9C37 for <behave@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www-data by mail.cacaoweb.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ivan@cacaoweb.org>) id 1Urq8b-0003Yk-W8; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:51:58 +0200
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:func.inc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:51:57 +0200
From: ivan c <ivan@cacaoweb.org>
Organization: cacaoweb
In-Reply-To: <51CAA20F.4070307@viagenie.ca>
References: <CB1B483277FEC94E9B58357040EE5D02325A6E93@xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com> <2f7dce8264c8a9a72640629502a44295@cacaoweb.org> <51C1681A.5030909@viagenie.ca> <f8741fad1af1cee094de9c59408b7425@cacaoweb.org> <51C40374.8080403@viagenie.ca> <21e25b7ae1501228a67656b2fa4bc009@cacaoweb.org> <51CAA20F.4070307@viagenie.ca>
Message-ID: <88c0ada2b8ebad078fb249ac6572fd8b@cacaoweb.org>
X-Sender: ivan@cacaoweb.org
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1
Cc: behave@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ivan@cacaoweb.org
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:51:18 -0000

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:10:55 +0200, Simon Perreault
<simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> Le 2013-06-25 18:46, ivan c a écrit :
>> We have, for all UDP communications and all outbound TCP sessions:
>> - one socket is bound to one local endpoint on the host. Additionally,
>> two
>> sockets have to bind to two different local endpoints.
> 
> Not true. If you call connect() on a UDP socket, it behaves just like a 
> TCP socket.


"Not true". interesting...
Do you mind providing a counterexample, ie some pseudo-code that binds two
sockets of the same protocol to the same local endpoint?



-- 
_Ivan Chollet_