IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] BEHAVE status update

Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn> Thu, 26 February 2009 06:08 UTC

Return-Path: <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68EE628C1E7 for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:08:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKz6bN8LhWTm for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:08:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ocean.net.edu.cn (ocean.net.edu.cn [202.112.0.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4792128C1DF for <behave@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:08:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ocean.net.edu.cn [202.112.0.56]) by ocean.net.edu.cn with ESMTP id n1Q66phd007669; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:54 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <49A6317B.2080502@cernet.edu.cn>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:51 +0800
From: Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@windows.microsoft.com>
References: <0c6301c994b5$f9d7ca30$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <49A11943.5070205@gmail.com> <E9CACA3D8417CE409FE3669AAE1E5A4F118EF867FB@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <E9CACA3D8417CE409FE3669AAE1E5A4F118EF867FB@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 'Behave WG' <behave@ietf.org>, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>, "behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] BEHAVE status update
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:08:21 -0000

>>> E meeting.
>>>       
>> I have the impression that we don't have a current analysis document
>> about these four scenarios, and reaching a decision just on the basis
>> of the paragraphs in the charter and a doodle poll seems a bit casual.
>> Section 1.5 of draft-baker-behave-v4v6-framework-01 does discuss two
>> cases, with placeholders for two others, but they don't seem to be
>> quite identical to the cases in the charter. Have I missed a document?
>>     
>
> Right now the doc you mention, and draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-00.txt
> both contain a subset of the scenarios and analysis.  It would be
> great if there were a single doc, it were complete.
>   

We try to summary the scenarios in

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-behave-v4v6-framework-02.txt

please comment.

xing

> -Dave
>
>   
>> Thanks
>>      Brian
>> _______________________________________________
>> Behave mailing list
>> Behave@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email