Return-Path: X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1E312004D; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:57:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rt2lmpCY-eIe; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:57:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0154120044; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id w8so1309181plq.5; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:57:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:thread-index :content-language; bh=7xt+YLVtJMlDdh0aH5yba6eLsq1+YyGFF+VNoAGLgQY=; b=E3wCnwBqO2PejzN9G8f5benGsh3qY9A6w248qXC9nbSycx2f6/CiEf4KyzJxOnp73z ujG1FMNoJ9f6WSjr/xEHQSgTeBk+scjwp8fSWJluxKiOWGMfAMXtKvbhZow2S+VvEhUM RRkY6gIoCsJ+2QwMeDydBS8FEQYEoOAfneYv3DZ+eKyf4Y3zorI47V5gD5JyIhUjalK5 xkZZ6BeCQJ9R7Y4LZYHkRUSbN+nogBZvl56oXxq80wbiXJ07VtJ5Q6MHMf0/+45OdAa/ qEJ0Y0+NonjPLs3OPOANAQg9e3Q4jzlSgHbXxVIJ79NQU9P4MFodISd0WTdVhh8dYVCe 7nLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :thread-index:content-language; bh=7xt+YLVtJMlDdh0aH5yba6eLsq1+YyGFF+VNoAGLgQY=; b=uedm02MiaUt3tVLV+cTdY3px6C+VpdKH5jv8XHVIvEeTHmgyGiQrrFazjEcSg8xhpg TOc0vja3tPw+xe82peyYRt78MbSEKoxXxhk5R3uMiMpdmsH1lVIMMl7GASeRnDwN2mVi SR3ufqBc0gYmGlbN5Uq56OutrGp6snNzFGBzNsp1FwtTzLrKrsYLhckCDLtkpjcNggzy QZH+lC4xIZsUO75CkXiH+pW+ESmfAh5KnpcF32hqFpNj6kxAs04p4zrHEJeYDJtXFhsd pOskFDVMylLisuYmWag/7e3fE2ci2VvydHhvLtjD+SfU3yqBBR9M7hWpGMiXBR52nx/5 IQCA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUz2tdVAU0zUQ4LJIRrWdyF0ImyJoJVTuaFi/jdXQ+CEhNEpZ16 elMP4SgQzDWpCzCfUXEiNLLzrqY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCGqzsCyvu4i7VzhmhhGbechYb2c8w+DAdrIG1Px15C9Dz/U5ZwA6tpfOO8zyRx0fCAFPxmQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ba95:: with SMTP id k21mr8502261pls.80.1569639441123; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SLITKOWS3YYU6 ([12.221.72.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c26sm3711106pfo.173.2019.09.27.19.57.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:57:20 -0700 (PDT) From: To: , Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:57:19 -0700 Message-ID: <045c01d575a8$71a5bb60$54f13220$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_045D_01D5756D.C5475890" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AdV1p77phYo3FgjZSc+woeKyumxlRA== Content-Language: fr Archived-At: Subject: [bess] Comments on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 02:57:27 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_045D_01D5756D.C5475890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Authors, I had a look on your draft and I have some concerns/questions that I would like to discuss. I like the fact of being able to tune the pref DF election per VLAN range, however: * Don't you think that using a local configuration may open to inconsistent configurations resulting in issues ? * How does the high_or_low works if I have more than 2 links in the ES ? (multihoming with 4 links with 4 levels of preference ?) Thanks, Stephane ------=_NextPart_000_045D_01D5756D.C5475890 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Authors,

 

I had a look on your draft and I have some = concerns/questions that I would like to discuss.

I like the fact of being able to = tune the pref DF election per VLAN range, = however:

  • Don’t you think that using a local configuration may = open to inconsistent configurations resulting in issues = ?
  • How = does the high_or_low works if I have more than 2 links in the ES ? = (multihoming with 4 links with 4 levels of preference = ?)

 

Thanks,

 

Stephane

 

------=_NextPart_000_045D_01D5756D.C5475890--