Re: [bess] a question about bundled service in draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08

Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> Thu, 20 July 2017 18:41 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: ghanwani@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <D595C2B0.213DB5%sajassi@cisco.com>
References: <CA+-tSzwAfZZ8EyvVbXxxZgWesS_P0jSwjvcSKjT7N76iBnzhUQ@mail.gmail.com> <D594D20D.2138C0%sajassi@cisco.com> <CA+-tSzywX3t_pMj7b4k2xq=iYbAtMxYCoR4Spj63O=_perZivw@mail.gmail.com> <D595C2B0.213DB5%sajassi@cisco.com>
From: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:41:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+-tSzz033L5+y1zht-p2NO+8nBsBMuhTr5K_FeGWeckd9H8tA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114abf6aab952c0554c418d5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/-VGI55twRuqhRK81ReEq9VljKYE>
Subject: Re: [bess] a question about bundled service in draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08
Precedence: list

Thanks Ali.


On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <sajassi@cisco.com>
wrote:

>
> Hi Anoop,
>
> The provided text is fine. Given that it is just a minor clarification
> text, I think it should be OK to incorporate it; however, I need to check
> with the chairs and the AD given that this draft has already gone through
> the WG LC.
>
> Cheers,
> Ali
>
> From: <ghanwani@gmail.com> on behalf of Anoop Ghanwani <
> anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 9:11 AM
> To: Cisco Employee <sajassi@cisco.com>
> Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [bess] a question about bundled service in
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08
>
> Thanks Ali.
>
> May be worth modifying the sentence below to say:
> >>>
>
> 8) When a 802.1Q interface is used between a CE and a PE, each of the
>    VLAN ID (VID) on that interface can be mapped onto a bridge table
>    (for upto 4094 such bridge tables). More than one bridge table may be
>    mapped onto a single MAC-VRF (in case of VLAN-aware bundle service).
>
> >>>
>
> Anoop
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <sajassi@cisco.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Anoop Ghanwani <
>> anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
>> Date: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 10:39 PM
>> To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [bess] a question about bundled service in
>> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08
>>
>>
>> This is what the draft says about bundled service:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08#section-4
>> >>>
>>
>> 8) When a 802.1Q interface is used between a CE and a PE, each of the
>>    VLAN ID (VID) on that interface can be mapped onto a bridge table
>>    (for upto 4094 such bridge tables). All these bridge tables may be
>>    mapped onto a single MAC-VRF (in case of VLAN-aware bundle service).
>>
>> >>>
>>
>> So it sounds like 1:1 is supported (that's the straightforward case where
>> the inner VLAD ID is stripped from the encap'ed packet) and All:1 is
>> supported (i.e. the service is blind to the incoming tag and just preserves
>> it as is, potentially with normalization if translation is required).
>>
>> What about the case for n:1 where I want some subset of VLAN IDs coming
>> in on a port to map to VNID1, and another subset map to VNID2?  Is that
>> explicitly disallowed?  If so, why?
>>
>> That’s is also supported. Refer to section 6 of RFC 7432 for different
>> service interfaces that are supported.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ali
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Anoop
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

[bess] a question about bundled service in draft-… Anoop Ghanwani
Re: [bess] a question about bundled service in dr… Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Re: [bess] a question about bundled service in dr… Anoop Ghanwani
Re: [bess] a question about bundled service in dr… Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Re: [bess] a question about bundled service in dr… Anoop Ghanwani