Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy
Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> Sun, 30 June 2019 17:05 UTC
Return-Path: <ghanwani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1FD120162; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CfEix-intl3n; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-f44.google.com (mail-vs1-f44.google.com [209.85.217.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28A3F120113; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-f44.google.com with SMTP id k9so7324779vso.5; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vwachaNEeYTxrXNE65tEDd3kWTB+2IbG5eKJ7o/S7ys=; b=l7YDNsFUkGuOyYW3Ihrvh1j6tGm+AktwJpA7BJFGen6NwweJp5t1iCfRjVeNxCglv8 l/1WGx4G0unMLHH2RoU2o9xkkw52Hvg0/9LyczkZYYXuo9KRoMUkBag4XPKvmt5MtkIq pKjY/lbmQwW6+JZqndUQbAePVmCB9cqo5OCa1ItahqbcOZiWv4DGO36C6sEYzR2EMNXe 9VxzuiLfpET5i+WjAYQuZZ1TFwA8qH71Bn7Rf7kl9k2uOKyXBolSqbMXIbnYIzoh8O22 uO0mlmrwc1chWoEE7yvQ0RhjKb32Q8mE5Nl1Km9e7bCrXx4TZw8IiqupE96Bg7ihKMTj wJSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV6O9yD2sb2xQbu+WPEYGRZ9X9KFR6duEjUhGEysGFLLUA6npQ7 fZhTN3SMUeUIMZPGRNTiK/Ga/VLdumBprIDa3tI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxxfTe+oRHKQGH9triXfx+eX/Bn82RP3DoKI/zHpwKiyrwcnMyi60gF8DHfUy3Agp/rHwXUFzOAReQgV1KpUTs=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:8042:: with SMTP id b63mr12696840vsd.23.1561914311833; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <26422_1560761590_5D0754F6_26422_456_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924C2551F0@OPEXCAUBMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CA+-tSzxK2bkxngU6x+Tgdqp2ohvKaF6-bmPv-38vqgRU_ix4Yw@mail.gmail.com> <249EBE75-391B-48D2-8A38-EEC4891F49CB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <249EBE75-391B-48D2-8A38-EEC4891F49CB@cisco.com>
From: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:05:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+-tSzyHDgAn2hOMBV_DXkqMOxF+r+Gj0YE0jp1c24NH0-84eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <mankamis@cisco.com>
Cc: "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="000000000000ba1e31058c8d837a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/-guEH7M0QK38TrtU0XDij6q3AXg>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 17:05:16 -0000
Hi Mankamana, I sent the doc to the authors, and I have put a pdf version here: https://anoop.updog.co/ietf/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-AG.pdf Thanks, Anoop On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 6:12 AM Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) < mankamis@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Anoop, > > Please send it across. We are going to make changes about editorial > comment right after WGLC and post updated version. > > > > Thanks > > Mankamana > > > > > > *From: *Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> > *Date: *Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 1:04 AM > *To: *"stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com> > *Cc: *"bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" < > bess-chairs@ietf.org> > *Subject: *Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy > *Resent-From: *<alias-bounces@ietf.org> > *Resent-To: *<matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, < > mankamis@cisco.com> > *Resent-Date: *Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 1:04 AM > > > > I support the publication of the document as an RFC. > > > > I have several editorial comments and I'll send them in a Word document > markup to the authors. > > > > If the mailing list accepts attachments, I'd be happy to post it here as > well. > > > > Thanks, > > Anoop > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 1:53 AM <stephane.litkowski@orange.com> wrote: > > Hello Working Group, > > > > This email starts a three weeks Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy [1]. > > > > This poll runs until *the 28th of June*. > > > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to > this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > > > > We have several IPRs already disclosed. > > > > If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been > disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > > > We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2]. > > > > Thank you, > > Stephane & Matthew > > > > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy/ > > [2] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw > > > > > > > > [image: Orange logo] <http://www.orange.com/> > > > > *Stephane Litkowski * > Network Architect > Orange/SCE/EQUANT/OINIS/NET > > Orange Expert Future Networks > > phone: +33 2 23 *06* 49 83 > <https://monsi.sso.francetelecom.fr/index.asp?target=http%3A%2F%2Fclicvoice.sso.francetelecom.fr%2FClicvoiceV2%2FToolBar.do%3Faction%3Ddefault%26rootservice%3DSIGNATURE%26to%3D+33%202%2023%2028%2049%2083%20> > NEW ! > mobile: +33 6 71 63 27 50 > <https://monsi.sso.francetelecom.fr/index.asp?target=http%3A%2F%2Fclicvoice.sso.francetelecom.fr%2FClicvoiceV2%2FToolBar.do%3Faction%3Ddefault%26rootservice%3DSIGNATURE%26to%3D+33%206%2037%2086%2097%2052%20> > NEW ! > stephane.litkowski@orange.com > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > >
- [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draf… stephane.litkowski
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … John E Drake
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Keyur Patel
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Luc André Burdet
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Neeraj Malhotra
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Derek Yeung
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Selvam Ramanathan
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Wen Lin
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Samir Thoria (sthoria)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Anuj Budhiraja (abudhira)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Kesavan Thiruvenkatasamy (kethiruv)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … stephane.litkowski
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … stephane.litkowski
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for … stephane.litkowski