[bess] Proposed updates to address comments to draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 30 October 2018 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B967128CFD; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 07:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_COMMENT_SAVED_URL=1.391, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFWB8UbeMysZ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 07:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 733CD1293FB; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 07:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id o2-v6so9067172lfl.13; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 07:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vcQXhb1AVewHd3m/tXhEiOmSODJ5uAZjr6+A9InLRqU=; b=FIBdVxbOHbildMTfaZy/B1aalo/nhQyqquUOTQk+7qF0rDW6iwHT0M8gpUWzU4GxIy eOWqLd3d50ECg1t6nfBiL8WEX07rzm5/kB1WPksH3N28JmwzY1jFuCDRltu9NZvV7TMU 7OjDKnqkGSe97R31OskXufrbCJfhFkRMx0YwZCIdrHGPjdeZMGoBri3HT+najf7PsQ/2 fyFleDNG5WHG8KiiuMEbEGVvC19kujjTjQfjPl0fVhapnhjLASPGxlAOWPXT5ozb3tJx tATvGg6Hp5lCCUAre9go0KT73QWFHemS7r++NDuiMDkp6ePH1CRpDYPAgklkRNFc7oRa uzAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vcQXhb1AVewHd3m/tXhEiOmSODJ5uAZjr6+A9InLRqU=; b=rDXGk7M6n/vFHNrU7cTqzJ0JT0Xu2YtxW4PURHcCSfM9xf/X2ypBx/u0g0SgEnRooP ysMULkhb2erhFVL5y2amrQAaVlPUKHvBldSlNNnJj7Cq1Y/a1Rj4XBQK4t1OJFs2WGdT cXi8o1jpRtLxsGT7xegZpuulnnew7wq6+7+dr3Ee7oN7ZuBbSVcP/jDWLEbXBwXrQio9 eZUa0dN4c1gC7yr/coJ6ZhhIRGsrFnBAw74l9X7IKV2ANYkS54ohLUNeAW8lZBzgGnP2 l/kHByGZKOyMPXQwe/q4TjtlVaL0yVIAJpHyD4C9Sp3vJ7+krAbD2E2+40mXv3RsHl+7 N4pw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gI1lEsqSyC7CkCSmoaX8URTiIu+HHGZrz7iopK3rDTuxxuhtukz c4HgPm602d+K2oJQovQETsTetGwRNOe14bj+Jek=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5d83R+QU3ZcBD0dTeSOr6uYzhbAnzTKIAkz666+TR4fA2aif/Fx/iyLzIDL6BtRErRj5xfu3BF1RcewxbT/IkU=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:ae03:: with SMTP id f3mr2283200lfc.86.1540911026525; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 07:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 07:50:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmW2qK3qVEGEL6fbjPUrEggGbrMbk3A=u4f3jbvB_XAuPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>, bess-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0000000000005e040a0579734e39"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/080yuw2AYefQ2-mupg-fDJ_A_Wo>
Subject: [bess] Proposed updates to address comments to draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:50:34 -0000

Dear Ali,
my sincere apologies for being so terribly late to address your comments at
the BESS WG meeting in Montreal. Below are the updates I propose:
OLD TEXT:
  Then The Downstream PE MAY
   initiate a switchover of the traffic from the Primary Upstream PE to
   the Standby Upstream PE.
NEW TEXT:
  Then The Downstream PE MAY
   initiate a switchover of the traffic from the Primary Upstream PE to
   the Standby Upstream PE only if the Standby Upstream PE deemed
   available.  The dedicated p2mp BFD session MAY monitor the state of
   the Standby Upstream PE.

OLD TEXT:
   Whenever the state of the BFD session changes to Down the Provider
   Tunnel will be considered down, and the downstream PE will switch to
   the backup Provider Tunnel.
NEW TEXT:
   Whenever the state of the BFD session changes to Down the Provider
   Tunnel will be considered down, and the downstream PE MAY switch to
   the backup Provider Tunnel only if the backup Provider Tunnel deemed
   available.  The dedicated p2mp BFD session MAY monitor the state of
   the backup Provider Tunnel.

Attached please find diff to highlight the update and the new version of
the draft.

Kind regards,
Greg