Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Luc André Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 23 October 2019 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5951120048; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n0LGZlnx8i7E; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54DE4120026; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id c11so13826943iom.10; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:accept-language:content-language:mime-version; bh=5WbdG3UAojTteOuhf7iszqdHHVefAmTQrMyCBoAjt2Q=; b=TcUXLIkBgDd4c2hnfe4Hg3wW7ST3NwfWqLFemViq9ArSC1QafUvoFkQfhdnPUFpKDy O5YX14sHNDixLtqw4iVztC6iSBnXzI/4W6lFj0l4zKnDH464QqxzTIqlXII8hMtetBWq qE4xyAXbry2OEquIupene47ze+VNOAe9SXCDjhJumfyw48z7xp5DTf+1ndcMIcOBrSCY heRxUkqEVvOdZnsnYcTa02OupMicOWhc4Hxy6YUPBfRpBylsMW3wBeCg/jY0O2MCbnoc wcAF7TrppuoYLUSCKsqOGR6/b2DD3yb1q3MD3bFFcJ9ZoIbSzzVe80N+41Jfwlm7qvFV kBoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=5WbdG3UAojTteOuhf7iszqdHHVefAmTQrMyCBoAjt2Q=; b=tx6zSmpvcmL3ofdADUTt29XUkSHQIzfc2XlX97O+FxydpsKgnKufQDArldknkmfowe V2auei+JTLxipS7eKkOetlTZgfleSAqjPwbD0EigtEOy5cRQWOfVvjb3rncLgBzYbaZ+ lCCG5qT0O5rAGHcEf55uW5gSsIW3w3F4ENDynHh7L8r9pywlpCMrSoMfpCrs/hMcW/Ka kaOMOIw6ob23xFnmCgiCyb/zVOWWjij8fQDUMzBqq7dPJjO03MeKNOhq9oN2m4qLZEb1 5Pk7CfyChfDTMxe9sb1ENlSWKxBDH2yyJbdv4+4Nh2RtN493IPkP998i2OsoAnXBBpFG IjHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU2zZqiUtVmNzW1dMISzTtVcrhYreKuX2fpl/vGBm0C3ANh6HGi JsyDzVFysAa5N0Zbp1Aov2A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz54H5tqjTiWX/W8D6UFdhbbvZTgrCyHXcOPP3NG8A7yBqS7J3AXMe1IHTEdvN2XB9bESySpA==
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c8cf:: with SMTP id y198mr774660iof.213.1571794673689; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM6PR07MB4252.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:301:204a::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t15sm3155323ioj.72.2019.10.22.18.37.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luc André Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "slitkows.ietf@gmail.com" <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df@ietf.org>
CC: "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df
Thread-Index: ASQ4ZiRkgrGekheOKhyC4N4nqnXwxw==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:37:52 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR07MB425254F5A35E42442F5DEC44AF6B0@DM6PR07MB4252.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <079001d588e7$78847ff0$698d7fd0$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR07MB425254F5A35E42442F5DEC44AF6B0DM6PR07MB4252namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/0MA1J5OeMGyifKXHfeZbgbsuyXE>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:37:57 -0000

Support, while noting that updating [DF] for [RFC8584] throughout will remove a missref.

I will send a few other minor comments offline to authors;

Regards,
Luc André

Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  |  laburdet.ietf@gmail.com  |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814


From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "slitkows.ietf@gmail.com" <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 10:47
To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df@ietf.org>
Cc: "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hello WG,

This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-04 [1].

This poll runs until * the 5th Of November *.


We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.

There is currently no IPR disclosed.



If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.



We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].



Thank you,

Stephane & Matthew

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df/
[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw