Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc

Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> Tue, 28 September 2021 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ghanwani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80F93A0E7A; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id reUZbLEnUyOE; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-f54.google.com (mail-lf1-f54.google.com [209.85.167.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 241093A0E68; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-f54.google.com with SMTP id b15so851592lfe.7; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=umjeuDddubUYixUi/x8UPPW3aXJNd6sk08drgtikmRs=; b=w9eDAlCVdem6jZE8TLniO9eI2pIM8ChGK06/HYJ9X3vfgnDhCZFmxyMdD2ABhS2cc9 fBGRFwkAwxMDoksUEq51cLDIeuMhJh7pnSYN2iGH9+wfQxBlmO9bokLyRqwnXz2JrjZT /Uu+iixPTbBbGUCUp9hlRScihvmmwvI6DagscT5F6HzCQqsVTh8TvNoCKySHEc3JOzzj Lfn6BRMdnsVxmkcLBl8hLqa5/GCLPmOhPL7mOa4WR8dqKyl63sTsnwv1ThNxynacIzC2 6e7ApIYImXem0qSP1aeJWE7DJFBssoCnqZ0X/EKu5jjUnCoAxCEF23QukDC8ndn/MOTJ I7XA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NtDN1f8bUQ4iXo4RbB+yBB0u/vwgu1IA2WIfOZQXPmHMmC2Ur BxAYR4J+hGDZCCJEdJn2TTtlRPnfi2MQV9cenHpv4YMz
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfDvd7add/Jwdy3Fj5kP2EymdHsdpG9QguXI41iZGpGnqdQya2RVuPmnkk2Q3lCD6Yhg3Q6l8k0uF8ZYC4R5k=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:22c3:: with SMTP id i186mr1799059lji.255.1632859006380; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <010901d7b42e$6b3c7ae0$41b570a0$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <010901d7b42e$6b3c7ae0$41b570a0$@gmail.com>
From: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:56:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+-tSzwiooJ_jS1vt=51pQ6pTM6w91Sh8LmxUAfQvg1TrKDA+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: BESS <bess@ietf.org>, bess-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000b2efe05cd139ddd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/0agUG6nyy_z_upZO3fmZdiGcfi8>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 19:56:53 -0000

Sorry, sent to the wrong thread.  Will resend to the correct one.

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 11:02 PM <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> This email starts a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc [1]
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a Standards Track RFC.
>
>
>
> This poll runs until the 12th October 2021.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from all the authors and contributors.
>
> There are currently two IPR disclosures.
>
>
>
> In addition, we are polling for knowledge of implementations of this draft, per the BESS policy in [2].
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Matthew & Stephane
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc/
>
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>