[bess] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-xie-bess-evpn-extension-evn6-00.txt
Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com> Mon, 29 July 2024 03:48 UTC
Return-Path: <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FA1C14F61C; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 20:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s0CCbfZOw9SK; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 20:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out203-205-221-233.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-233.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0F6EC14F5F6; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 20:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1722224887; bh=UzMIrWU3BfFI4+gubpQ5G+a2cFaKCfOTuXxzGOKmF7Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References; b=MQqYcYgdv/plDA/H4rxHgfMnwTAcpHNV15ZqUUbDldtO76v6sZputN8nrp69buxaL p0w9C0p/YIxG0aRwCMgTfiDTMTSs2kphK4taAxuDdR0UfbRc5e0n+boCeqe4V65KcX j08OcAPeBalI0GGxMXEQAYjapFRSQD0c2IfoIC0I=
Received: from LAPTOP-BOBOCIFS ([219.142.69.77]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrszb9-1.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id A810AEAA; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:42:01 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1722224521tb13zxjrd
Message-ID: <tencent_1363000F3902CCD262C72BE30AFFF235AE09@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: M/NR0wiIuy70XUNLSAt4aYhyEb5/X5Qx37hCbPloQ1BSJqrSlk6yQfGSiZguT/ RMY45humhwkQbQ0jdp7lEZXDlbV4GGJka3KW/6sUIfhX27GPDUAcbLJ6GYbefnL27B0rYtIzy1Tw qv89icNg6TadxRDmOEIdCQTnGVi45w2F1mX30l2nNXhSR2FLUcBIHl5zZzC3HUtLdZxRdS/gwUOd qBwaK65Hzd95/eT17IPUi9KjjtUGFCVS8VH3BReHG9N01U/uZr7RdBLRfKiEeK6PAB4wXNd7zC+E MPyBRN7pm7NFmU0SgstNXMancc1YVJ6zHcSOhR7PEgfDKPgiLBJXOSK1mG7cFvCChLbxLZMllcvl 0G4VZ/U/V1Ljo5mAbMz/FUd/dPi7Tns7hZvQ2Ro6BmwdnBj5nmCLuk0KwCTDYrrfZdxGvOeciiVl l/kXEv//vjumOl+3LyjZA0AM/VuKIiVqjGs/fvOc/CYnpk2IWBoADMJNmfpYv0JW5AxfiYHD+n89 TZk3lL5uprTL0So+j/5Hzz68BF+n2FEhtXQZhiOagzexLzSh/1lEv2xSEgj8xnhihW4JPAWc9yYg VgPNZcCBZCfhbG46qi7PNgsjJurAmfxJcQlPiPB/Wqor2UxmRXQDjKMosiPI9lfodQ9q+NfRO0ic VBpKkp5/bgYogT3xstXWIhOBl6j4OizW3l29UTCzX5woZ/+AzdEwH3+L4//itSwF5XEwizxisn+7 fuuIfAZSREA6e/S/lKSIcQD0UyAKffl6P4Cya//dsZqC0+EAL9NoTka5pjtlWraRgiuzCLu+K3f8 qowbTeL9NfZj8DbP2ERywaxL1qcLPFkV8d0CgflMFETSLhuOEGYTiKTQAgNMF678GZSgjg5trgF+ xb517lfi9Y0L4/vWbPAJSbFQKtQdIlaMSJla7O7Ix0CZAWyNbdAhHQdCnnTrvK1OYFGzc8ypQfs6 S/9JOS5d8k+MOfsXpXYFV3igE9abr06keaOW9Zj7II9V2+EGg7njL3/Zop+aqW
X-QQ-XMRINFO: MPJ6Tf5t3I/ycC2BItcBVIA=
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:42:01 +0800
From: Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
References: <tencent_4609C7A8195E2C4AA5716171BECCF5162006@qq.com>, <CABNhwV2BN3jxhpwHd2oAf=YoFP=xV3d-5JLHLoS1QO89g_mdfA@mail.gmail.com>, <CABNhwV059t+X8j4JhFSuK7zvD0PNnW+0gN_WGAO2Jr7_EO6EMQ@mail.gmail.com>, <CABNhwV18+KwyG2ooX8kTXKER-ZybA-D3KFusNuAVrfXq4XnumQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: A0CBDF8B-38C5-4110-898E-C9E20E12D015
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.259[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OQ-MSGID: <2024072911420071119013@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart567040475072_=----"
Message-ID-Hash: GQOTI3S7CKK5BZ6TAZNBQAJU4K7M65XO
X-Message-ID-Hash: GQOTI3S7CKK5BZ6TAZNBQAJU4K7M65XO
X-MailFrom: chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-bess.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: bess <bess@ietf.org>, nvo3 <nvo3@ietf.org>, xing <xing@cernet.edu.cn>, sunjb <sunjb@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [bess] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-xie-bess-evpn-extension-evn6-00.txt
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/0jb7eYPfB_fZx-44YUiOdjXCGtI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:bess-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:bess-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bess-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Gyan, Thank you for your comments to this draft. I think the approach in serure EVPN draft focuses on to leverage BGP signaling for key and policy exchange among PE devices, it does not deal with exchanging MAC/site prefix/VEI required by EVN6, EVN6 leverages IPv6's capabilities,for instance, largere address space, to enhance Virtual Network encapsulation over an IPv6 Underlay Network. However, the draft you raised is interesting, I will continue to study it. You are welcome to provide more comments and suggestions. Best regards Chongfeng From: Gyan Mishra Date: 2024-07-28 06:04 To: Chongfeng Xie CC: bess; nvo3; xing; sunjb; evyncke Subject: [bess] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-xie-bess-evpn-extension-evn6-00.txt Hi Chongfeng I thought about this drafts use case a bit further and I AFAIK secure EVPN draft is the solution that exists for this type of use case where you have disparate EVPN PE gateways. Since you can build a eBGP multihop tunnel for the control plane typically done for OTT overlay EVPN for BGP Only DC over L3 core the same concept can be applied here for your use case over public Internet and can use secure EVPN. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn/ Kind Regards Gyan On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 1:35 AM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Chongfeng To expand on the use case for the disparate network PEs is the they have IPv6 connectivity between them so could be remote PE gateways under their admin control however all intermediate nodes are outside their admin control. Data plane stitch even without overlay stitch does require some trust level. Also generally if you are able to stitch data plane more then likely trust level is such that you can extend the overlay as well. This is a good use case for SRv6 Compression C-SID Nexf SID (uSID) which allows you to use IPv6 data plane to stitch so can stitch seamlessly and the other side does not have to be aware and can blindly forward the packets. So the situation use case is interesting but I think corner case. Kind Regards Gyan On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 11:59 PM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Chongfeng This is a very intriguing solution. The use case for this solution is EVPN L2 stretch over the internet or disparate IP networks that could be in the same OAD admin domain and have IP connectivity between disparate PEs but do not have the availability to natively extend the EVPN control plane but are able to stitch the data plane. I think if you are able to extend EVPN control plane natively then you would do regular EVPN but if you cannot then you are stuck and this solution fills that gap. I guess there could be case of a Telco cloud providet with hybrid cloud on prem and off prem DC CSP cloud provider through a CXP POP and now this could be method of providing L2 stretch of data plane via EVN6 control plane. With the procedure once the tunnel is established at the beginning once the dynamic mapping happens would you not need DF election ? Since this is all new procedures from RFC 7432 and RFC 8365 base RFCs would you have to write the entire new EVPN control plane procedures. For example how would RFC 9135 inter subnet forwarding work? Very nice indeed! Kind Regards Gyan On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 12:52 AM Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com> wrote: Hello everyone, We have submitted a new draft on "EVPN Route Types and Procedures for EVN6" to BESS WG, it proposes extensions to EVPN for EVN6. EVN6 is a Layer-2 network model built on top of the IPv6 underlay to provide connectivity between dispersed customer sites, the draft of EVN6 has been presented in Intarea and v6ops WGs. We are looking forward to your review and comments to this new draft. Thanks. Best regards Chongfeng From: 【外部账号】 Date: 2024-07-26 12:25 To: Chongfeng Xie; Guoliang Han; Jibin Sun; Xing Li Subject: New Version Notification for draft-xie-bess-evpn-extension-evn6-00.txt A new version of Internet-Draft draft-xie-bess-evpn-extension-evn6-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Chongfeng Xie and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-xie-bess-evpn-extension-evn6 Revision: 00 Title: EVPN Route Types and Procedures for EVN6 Date: 2024-07-25 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 13 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-xie-bess-evpn-extension-evn6-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xie-bess-evpn-extension-evn6/ HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xie-bess-evpn-extension-evn6 Abstract: EVN6 is a mechanism designed to carry Ethernet virtual networks, providing Ethernet connectivity to customer sites dispersed on public IPv6 networks. At the data layer, EVN6 directly places the Ethernet frames in the payload of IPv6 packet, and dynamically generates the IPv6 addresses of the IPv6 header using host MAC addresses and other information, then sends them into IPv6 network for transmission. This document proposes extensions to EVPN for EVN6, including two new route types and related procedures. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-leave@ietf.org
- [bess] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-xie… Chongfeng Xie
- [bess] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft… Gyan Mishra
- [bess] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft… Gyan Mishra
- [bess] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft… Gyan Mishra
- [bess] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft… Chongfeng Xie
- [bess] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft… Chongfeng Xie