Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-04

Jeff Tantsura <> Tue, 14 February 2017 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF81A129571 for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:22:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vHNDz5_RegHH for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:22:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7457912950C for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:22:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id c4so1496048wrd.1 for <>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:22:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4nGVai0cpEaOUP1p3PXXTqIRLeTV8I/2498wdfjEWEE=; b=n2E2YwrGkkINIPevZxnHTWb+ozhwU01DsTdpsOE/GhV2MQKaD6xhUmla5hZTMfuyPd 9aqwELcw0GPqyQfSAtzsauK5e+ED6iDjDbxzDz1YrwMx54QnR3sUG0ELILI1+8VqD9Kz vH4D6LE/YuIt5MArQYjcAbMVTCjK8l3ZK3hpCxIkylR06T6foiMThumi1w4xvgUe1lgb 9MC9HXA2iTWR72VmHxfcgs1wiX2D5DkGqClc7KSVvyVNnohjiw3mhRjlBJ+lH+FEQS3+ CqKs1IOuXsHsksd854DQFLMjRAroYmqGH+/6d5RMh1dqISE17Heu/VHSV0d3f+gAa2p6 zajw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4nGVai0cpEaOUP1p3PXXTqIRLeTV8I/2498wdfjEWEE=; b=q7PSq+uEJPuXjQvDiqPLaBqIBiRK6LG5H6UZ/LkjQcGY1zxE2T7Ze0yf77z/NM37xn Cl3j/tfseodq4FDBAc+lQOFXG7UiI+gRv8K1RbZAKr9cwew7dEZ1H+x+nrepUxSJUnx2 ZjvrOlVG/H7tGq67vO3E+l/a8CIQyO8VI+SFtNxaIkidWZ+vDOIIRgwjdrCHGBUGWZHM NBjU2PGBIO6c/vfCD3/YRcHy15AtVoN00FXugsTFWG8rjAuUFTLX2aDawE5K8p7K7pYd 7agZZgaWCUbqoypcJFrOCENS8e+Gq8z0q+OOfO44Y9f5eQeu1yKefqHBhXoBqwv+leC1 snlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lgQQc4PMuhwqQisLqMQssi16BGAIrazUbfHBgi498N2fQe4U0xKQ4CArmjlEYqsQ==
X-Received: by with SMTP id w21mr24618394wra.108.1487067760953; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:22:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ([]) by with ESMTPSA id 18sm181569wrb.14.2017. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:22:39 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1e.0.170107
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:22:28 -0800
From: Jeff Tantsura <>
To: Martin Vigoureux <>, BESS <>
Message-ID: <>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-04
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-04
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:22:45 -0000



    On 2/13/17, 5:07 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
    < on behalf of> wrote:
    >Hello Working Group,
    >This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
    >draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-04 [1] which is considered
    >mature and ready for a final working group review.
    >Note that this call is longer than usual because we are pushing two
    >correlated documents together.
    >Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent
    >version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than
    >*5th of March*.
    >Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is
    >also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as a Proposed
    >Standard RFC.
    >*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
    >applies to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement, to ensure that IPR
    >has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979,
    >4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
    >*If* you are listed as a document author or contributor of
    >draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-04 please respond to this
    >email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
    >Note that, as of today, no IPR has been disclosed against this document
    >or its earlier versions.
    >We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all of
    >what this document specifies. This information is expected as per [2].
    >Please inform the mailing list, or the chairs, or only one of the chairs.
    >Thank you,

    BESS mailing list