[bess] Genart early review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-08

Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 06 June 2024 20:52 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171770714604.39496.9383152899909900406@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 13:52:26 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: MJRWOPLKL4D2TSIHEQ4TDNSXO7MCB53O
CC: bess@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon.all@ietf.org
Reply-To: Jouni Korhonen <jounikor@gmail.com>
Subject: [bess] Genart early review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-08
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/2zIles6qMhRuG_Y5B9nqRuubsqQ>

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am an assigned GEN-ART directorate reviewer for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-08.

Summary: Ready with nits

Overall I found the document ready for publication. I have not followed the
topic thus I abstain myself from technical commentary.

Editorial nits:
1) In Section 1.1 Introduction the acronyms are used without a) expanding them
on the first use and/or b) before Section 1.2 Conventions and Terminology. Take
ES, ESI, AC, BUM, A-D as examples. Expand and/or rearrange sections. 2)  Some
acronyms are not expanded at all in the document. I admit most are common &
known within MPLS etc genres but still.. Take PE as an example. 3) No acronym
introduction is Section name (i.e. Section 2.1)

[bess] Genart early review of draft-ietf-bess-evp… Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker
[bess] Re: Genart early review of draft-ietf-bess… Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)