[bess] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery-10: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification.

I have no comments from transport protocol point of view. However, I am missing
how the skew (in section 3) will be calculated. Is this well defined? Is there
a scenario where more than one PEs take over if PE2 (in the example) fails? if
yes, how would then the skewing work?