[bess] Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-06
Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 16 March 2025 16:05 UTC
Return-Path: <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: bess@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7F4C405C2; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 09:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JI7ubtUq99iq; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 09:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 293EAC405BA; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 09:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e53a91756e5so3291308276.1; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 09:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742141150; x=1742745950; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=z5sjjglxhy66Xk4RaTMTFtJQ1mrWJTa7EGOmqKL7tX4=; b=nnfM7yH7RGSf2ZsxxGHPyiu57/poLhZ3ff5CO7OJQG6QMnOYNg9JestFrmt1ORGM6u 4q1QophRqv2SsZO1pXnfq71+n2cVz/i625rthkTxsKrheH0c24UvwpD4ssWomZtmQa3g lzrnGg+Bw+Ctcu2ubsZCRMUXRz0Yq/kz9U7sBFAFaF+p1evJXVMMBxww5oscekejcplg 8NQSRhsQA1Ts/OETP7Gz1rjaVm5Bj2HTsUVCAd80nDi50UantdT72j31y8LxJH76Tyg8 HJc676+lfT2qJ/Gxoe4sX2QmLtXuO/BbwOQhlVYjHxXdyFo6n68kDIdL/kL/jsxFCy9i 6BSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742141150; x=1742745950; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=z5sjjglxhy66Xk4RaTMTFtJQ1mrWJTa7EGOmqKL7tX4=; b=Yg69osJfSxlaGjQaDA+SBMM55sg12ORzmNSTWk+Zw7VcV3Wd83FoEbgurpxiQW6D/T +LduY6BQu0AAYWO/Ae8VLfIvdneFwQktYgkO3xTosFvdEiuRBZtumypALjZASJxb1XsB ilkpqDOLLJHem781DKhTVnnj+sicXNyUJT4ahY/8tNuHz7EKSjVXKOuYDE4Rew81YiU/ KjpjIRBVwmKQxLImN+PCh99c/os1uItmhC8W386WusUFnz2+jzByRRnXFooB/CH3T1m7 YNGisg3QtwcOSFxZ7qqMZnur8UbfUDHyJFVbJWS1erWUN7n4he078zd8e3ts8+ONBuYD K2Yw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVwTU8bIqIRyCXVaWRWLPpn2mxkMbWIu6hZO1qrSIT+16p5VtSg5hCYsVaIV85keVWLzYym@ietf.org, AJvYcCWvJFcRHbUhVS0u3Uww+YXH9BudjmoKgnroLpHwmshAh3E+j6xxM0tK43Yj2Mor82q9IKCblxsftbAQPC8YH2ZjZgqLMBC1SkVDJxCwViZhPYhH@ietf.org, AJvYcCXNWlcC+gMGWanRwDDItNTIYrKuBwd8QxK0R8WQs8zeH0p9y5H9RjydpekS33tmNxBn7N7YMdvowi5U@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwN0QcPvm5H1JFjRmo0HYp/elnau74FtWbXZBn+DcCz5xksmwo+ bsWcHLk+/lZkjC6e7TJFy1CKJ8VEai8ubDwc5EYv99M+N43R7td827QHr9+f2l23Rcv4bOQX8M9 j0cIdKBTqzGEzl4vGtW0D7m5o9uw=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuYh6QBakAobfZgV8XvBnE7NmE0M9Is9vKRRI6l+VBSO2P7kyF/r7HSn7tfz6p wsyMIn0lGkGCTmv3j7sukmfjfVW0BXI6AOTQpKsbSnV8M/FYYNRSpo4C6/qRuosoHSemPvBEOZ9 jJcNEeDaqUaB+E1n5bgch3xCbLYuo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF6LHyyXc/cUVW55B1st/L8KvueXv8VWed4Wyu3JShhgVvghmyvCWYnBEcTbVAHQaqdPC+prLXHQBeQooJ4yVw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:450f:b0:6f9:5530:f37e with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6ff460568d5mr123058197b3.37.1742141150607; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <174211354399.141962.10858536362796685879@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z>
In-Reply-To: <174211354399.141962.10858536362796685879@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z>
From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 23:05:26 +0700
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1Jpy0GkHXzP9wAUyX7X4nTiGRnGfJQWy0i0GE4nJnLgWpXqTnFNT_J-ZX3s
Message-ID: <CAH6gdPxeE_4odoWnM8S6rfaTZGGDngVayVouboBK=d_fbCRq2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e41ae063077d8b0"
Message-ID-Hash: UAB7J7XROT6KIT3B7DSZNGJU5T5R5KB3
X-Message-ID-Hash: UAB7J7XROT6KIT3B7DSZNGJU5T5R5KB3
X-MailFrom: ketant.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-bess.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ops-dir@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [bess] Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-06
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/5A5tyJhUklBomH6LZ_GW5XomRQE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:bess-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:bess-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bess-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Joe, Thanks for your review of the document. The nits that you've caught will be addressed in the next version of the document. Thanks, Ketan On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 3:26 PM Joe Clarke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Joe Clarke > Review result: Has Nits > > I have been asked to review this draft on behalf of the OPS directorate. > This > draft updates RFC9252 to add clarity for processing SRv6 SID > advertisements for > SRv6 endpoint behaviors that support arguments. From an OPS perspective, I > think this document is ready. I particularly appreciated the call to log > likely config errors to aid with troubleshooting. The additional examples > were > also helpful. > > Overall, I only found two small nits. In Section 3: > > s/The procedures in this document remains/The procedures in this document > remain/ > > And in Section 4: > > s/the alternative method specified in document/the alternative method > specified > in this document/ > > > >
- [bess] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-… Joe Clarke via Datatracker
- [bess] Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-b… Ketan Talaulikar