Re: [bess] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 17/12/15 13:30, Benoit Claise wrote:
> 3)      Is security section really a security section? It seems more like
> “do this policy” or this will fail.  It should get a stronger review from
> the security directorate

I've not posted a ballot for this one as my question is more
"What does P really stand for in this kind of VPN?" and I don't
really get what here is new that requires a PS. So any security
discuss would likely be met by "not new, can't change" and is
therefore perhaps not the best use of our time. It'd be better
if we could get some folks to try to re-instate the P == Private
in VPN. (But that is admittedly very hard if one really has to
do multicast.)

S.