Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Tue, 30 January 2018 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D2E12EC6A; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:42:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5PjxjTRhVJe7; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 912F512EBF9; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:41:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108157.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0UGFVVS005339; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:17:19 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=7rAsRdi8sBqES4z4I7kKh/JS4uu1QAzD8VYKUg33vlw=; b=SYshg1zoal1D69BNTPnq4nq3DB5vlMRKCvIGtMgSAnqEwpeMRxVk8KetELclgpLBDVen Uoiqk+SBVw553VhZz+WJs9z5P+75IO7AvlU+4QYB/d2PhQ5EJdM8eFGH5fIa81ZFu8EF iD0D8oszkb6YDept0oTizC0ndGFgXqra4w3FREHVGduhCFPBjDTB9cT7tmTrBQg71Hx8 dgWw72srtE5JDsWC5prpoR/mkP2+5KnVT2jYNQWpgp+JB/Ndb/9Xm7tXpnCGqn6H+jza sSe+fQ6LPXdy+T+ezLhMNjXxpy2zMh0sevuiCqJB0iQ+ZqUSze/xll+fORGUCUJDMG/p kg==
Received: from nam01-sn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01lp0120.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.120]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ftnv0s794-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:17:18 -0800
Received: from DM5PR0501MB3831.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.108.17) by DM5PR0501MB3894.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.108.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.464.6; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:17:10 +0000
Received: from DM5PR0501MB3831.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::64ad:5405:c8ee:e21]) by DM5PR0501MB3831.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::64ad:5405:c8ee:e21%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0464.008; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:17:10 +0000
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>, "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>, "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df.authors@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df
Thread-Index: AdOY2sLz2JVrLLhYRMyg7cHiqlyLHQA0qItAAA51BAAAAKOmsA==
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:17:10 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR0501MB38315880C44593A006BB7230C7E40@DM5PR0501MB3831.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <26309_1517214443_5A6EDAEB_26309_28_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921EB33D25@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <AM5PR0701MB28362518FD4DAD649488C813E0E40@AM5PR0701MB2836.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <837FF7C6-D07B-4411-95A5-F89458C38763@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <837FF7C6-D07B-4411-95A5-F89458C38763@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR0501MB3894; 7:r/G/qstvTIYtVPe68dE1fpjWVoKIOM1ePhVHFo4FDgm8JmG8YmGGlDK+UnZF1AqdYrPJuASgnEd2KQCD4gkqyt3Yc392Lmylp/DLj0muHetdiViZFn/a1Ci2qiTeZfKup5Z267bkquxL+R0RKjZx1yVUfezqM5dAESDWuBxejvwc9uDFXr52VsxEwAMnsoYc6erFsTdBukL9SV60cwfvyVfny/HGaA0Ly/2l1PeGT7eSqgqLtB+q56+brczUy9XL
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3cf4f97a-be2c-4f9a-a51d-08d567fceaa5
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR0501MB3894;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR0501MB3894:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR0501MB3894FAF1A0F98615404FE41AC7E40@DM5PR0501MB3894.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(10436049006162)(120809045254105)(138986009662008)(82608151540597)(18271650672692)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3231101)(944501161)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6041288)(20161123564045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DM5PR0501MB3894; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR0501MB3894;
x-forefront-prvs: 0568F32D91
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(39380400002)(396003)(39850400004)(366004)(346002)(189003)(199004)(51914003)(790700001)(6116002)(229853002)(236005)(606006)(25786009)(8656006)(53936002)(99286004)(55016002)(110136005)(33656002)(7736002)(6246003)(186003)(3846002)(74316002)(5250100002)(5890100001)(2501003)(316002)(6436002)(966005)(478600001)(14454004)(26005)(5660300001)(86362001)(53546011)(2900100001)(102836004)(66066001)(8936002)(2950100002)(81166006)(97736004)(105586002)(2201001)(8676002)(3280700002)(7696005)(3660700001)(9686003)(6506007)(19609705001)(76176011)(68736007)(6306002)(81156014)(9326002)(106356001)(59450400001)(54896002)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR0501MB3894; H:DM5PR0501MB3831.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: BxrvEnIrw7zcX0bSHy7YKFN+JUnzqp4rQOEqQUDiShl8ic26HdErojKPDJhSd135kzi8oI7b65HkKN1hZQkhlA==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM5PR0501MB38315880C44593A006BB7230C7E40DM5PR0501MB3831_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3cf4f97a-be2c-4f9a-a51d-08d567fceaa5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Jan 2018 16:17:10.8155 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR0501MB3894
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-01-30_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1801300203
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/94wylCS-0Su50FlJu5ED2EIhIgw>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:42:14 -0000

Hi,

The HRW DF election draft defines a new extended community, the DF Election Extended Community (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-03#section-7), which contains a DF election type registry.  Why don’t we define a value for AC-based DF election and have the PEs supporting it advertise the extended community w/ that value and either  include a normative reference to the HRW draft or move the extended community and the text describing its usage to the AC-based election draft?

Yours Irrespectively,

John

From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 10:28 AM
To: Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>om>; stephane.litkowski@orange.com; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df.authors@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df

Hi Gunter,

Thanks for the feedback.
About this:
I was wondering why this document, even though being backward compatible with RFC7432, is Informational track, and not standard track.

I just sent an email providing the initial reasoning discussed among the authors. If we still think Standards Track is more appropriate, I think it is ok to change it.

Thank you.
Jorge



From: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com<mailto:gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>>
Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 10:46 AM
To: "stephane.litkowski@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkowski@orange.com>" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkowski@orange.com>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df.authors@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df.authors@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df.authors@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df.authors@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
Resent-To: <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>>, <kiran.nagaraj@nokia.com<mailto:kiran.nagaraj@nokia.com>>, <senthil.sathappan@nokia.com<mailto:senthil.sathappan@nokia.com>>, <vinod.prabhu@nokia.com<mailto:vinod.prabhu@nokia.com>>, <hliu@ciena.com<mailto:hliu@ciena.com>>, <wlin@juniper.net<mailto:wlin@juniper.net>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 10:46 AM

I support progress and publish as RFC.

The document is well written and resolves with a reasonable approach logical failures or human errors, that would otherwise result in significant service problems.
I was wondering why this document, eventhough being backward compatible with RFC7432, is Informational track, and not standard track.

G/

From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkowski@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 09:27
To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df.authors@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df.authors@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df


    Hello Working Group,



    This email starts a Working Group Last Call on

    draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df-03 [1] which is considered mature and

    ready for a final working group review.



    Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent version

    yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than *12th of February*.

    Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is

    also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as an Informational

    RFC.



    In addition, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that

    applies to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df, to ensure that IPR has

    been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879,

    3669 and 5378 for more details).



    If you are listed as a document Author or Contributor of the draft

    please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware

    of any relevant IPR.



    Note that, as of today, no IPR has been disclosed against this document

    or its earlier versions.



    We are **also polling for knowledge of implementations** of part or all

    of what this document specifies. This information is expected as per [2].

    Please inform the mailing list, or the chairs, or only one of the chairs.



    Thank you,

    Stephane & Martin



    [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ac-df/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbess-2Devpn-2Dac-2Ddf_&d=DwMGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH-s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=-zlCnslm0PJtETrW9LwiRBq9tpS-C8lMIKVsb3GNHgA&s=CO5hmef8UoTQcbY3ZaDqNwvV778ef2A5Pu3OCEZ_oJE&e=>

    [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailarchive.ietf.org_arch_msg_bess_cG3X1tTqb-5FvPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw&d=DwMGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH-s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=-zlCnslm0PJtETrW9LwiRBq9tpS-C8lMIKVsb3GNHgA&s=hXo_HNWIJVmJePJd9bCtzdfDFbF97WKQx4k_6qZPSM8&e=>






_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.