IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] Suggestion on v4-only/v6-only drafts

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 11 November 2022 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C95C14F733 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:56:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lGxaFg2U5Vnm for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B7D6C14F728 for <bess@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:56:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id e13so242211edj.7 for <bess@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:56:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=whW0IJ3OLibeyB4acYIUzuERTz4dsZYzq7YLFsjDc/Q=; b=NJAj38s7KR02zL8o7GEVe9fvdaTfvZmH5EzTsXBtuNDJNE8WiqS5e4fNQiMsOmNA7+ 5aWDvXMVYfbD4gFm9evZKktywX4Pntvr8S5gFE21nOfxoxC1SXNtOWisGIMCo7bME2tX 2a95Zs/wczY9jRW0HiJ3WuLZHsoz+BLXNsQ0JzGlKS3sQibb9cd5sNDuaJffCwGM+0CJ J+XDhvh4PYKUYlzkQ4AnhiKweObi8FphEyYuMsVOaCGAw/WL5JSMceRiArnEeY6CbIqf KYhjWyS6qvePTW2wPyPsuKP/CmBXpvRO+EYf6aT8unAwF7LKz8TEoyueEprQgpE6188w FkUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=whW0IJ3OLibeyB4acYIUzuERTz4dsZYzq7YLFsjDc/Q=; b=BrwLwsIxuqwahn+7VdffvkjNHQvOL2oBM3kgusbB1w3aMwxbWpZBmXxUNa0fazpaff 9rK8vCFuym1/TNG0p6q9Qbyuha1zlcF5+yEtF2JARk5ArVFfxpmi6y1ZFaLCDA988lKh j5S52lDqbD8FqCpIj5kducr+lNkYybJGkck/NEtF1vIJtDZcH2VeYp7Yk6+YUmZw9NHQ idh9lKuuQMFOQHGGancxcIp/3VQEHaNMCOy6fTa53snwaKD+YV95Bav03SkDxAVn2uAC FXfYXKkBcs0y5hkJrvPMQE6rfthtL3dU82gy7GT2JRidAhQUUGL9qgOxgJwtBd01owGT aIyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnljfP+CvaBBG1LZ5/87FCDoLDlFoPFZ/K1QQDQRLBmmT6o7yD6 gWScQhZZ+tWSLxLRhgCwz88eEvfOM8zPeTOCmyei06jEJUswanrME5U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5RBE9/hwIYFGkdo/tOBlZAPKsmKBSscSli2wwmc2dPk5vlg/NFQiF2OsxFiQBurxbxPNABCZFEtRRYAKkNWuk=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d751:0:b0:467:42a9:3568 with SMTP id a17-20020aa7d751000000b0046742a93568mr3008895eds.70.1668200209439; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:56:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH6gdPzcMxor9hZy=+hS5oZPB_onU45-vh-ijm1jD2WPb0y+Gw@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV3bF=J7HDZ1Z3vxiJcLGcxOkXst+S1+1DHkdBQ+VdcbMA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV3bF=J7HDZ1Z3vxiJcLGcxOkXst+S1+1DHkdBQ+VdcbMA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 21:58:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHMGd=7iBOQd=wUhjUJ3dPfHgY1+sf22AzpadoqCCdMrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="000000000000e6584805ed382074"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/9DK42lZRIWoNpepP-0I3eXxClG8>
Subject: Re: [bess] Suggestion on v4-only/v6-only drafts
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 20:56:56 -0000

Gyan,


> IDR draft:
>
> The 4PE draft connecting IPv4 islands over an IPv6 core  over the global
> table is similar in semantics to 6PE RFC 4798 which connects IPv6 islands
> over an IPv4 core over the global table and the draft is extensible to
> SR-MPLS and SRv6. There currently is not a standard for 4PE so this draft
> would standardize 4PE for vendor  interoperability.
>

Not true.

Quote from RFC8950:

[image: image.png]

I do not see anything your draft would add to it.

Cheers,
R.





>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mishra-idr-v4-islands-v6-core-4pe/
>
> BESS drafts - these drafts are completely different from IDR 4PE draft.
>
> I have already combined two of the drafts into one for the IPv4-Only PE
> All SAFI draft
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mishra-bess-ipv4-only-pe-design-all-safi/
>
> IPv6 Only PE Design BCP draft below was adopted  last year and the new
> draft extensible to ALL SAFI Standards Track below I plan to progress
> separately.  As one is BCP and the other Standards track I don’t think they
> could be combined and even if they were combined into the super set all
> SAFI that would have to go through adoption process again anyway so I plan
> to keep separate.
>
> This draft I will queue up for adoption call.
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mishra-bess-ipv6-only-pe-design-all-safi/
>
>
> Many Thanks
>
> Gyan
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 6:19 AM Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gyan,
>>
>> Sharing a couple of suggestions here for your 5 drafts (4 in BESS + 1 in
>> IDR) as we lost time due to the audio issues:
>>
>> (1) put the portions to be standardized (very focussed/small hopefully)
>> in one single draft and post/share with both IDR and BESS since you are
>> changing NH encoding (from what I heard?)
>> (2) all other informational/BCP material could be combined in a single
>> draft (perhaps the existing BESS WG draft)
>>
>> IMHO, that would facilitate an appropriate focussed review of the
>> content/proposals.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ketan
>>
>> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>
> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email