IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] MIBDoc review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-02.txt

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E52412B038; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 00:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PRvSE2vWeh3Z; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 00:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F887128E19; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 00:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CLE41393; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 07:30:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA417-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.34) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:29:59 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.42]) by SZXEMA417-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:29:45 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Glenn Mansfield Keeni <glenn@cysols.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "thomas.morin@orange.com" <thomas.morin@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: MIBDoc review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRlTmGDHBP+/aDVkWEHjJ7RACieZ/UgMDw
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 07:29:45 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE28CC742F5@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <56E7D219.7000902@orange.com> <56FBD402.9040102@cisco.com> <56FBDD81.6080502@cysols.com> <11152_1459347064_56FBDE78_11152_10229_1_56FBDE77.6030605@orange.com> <56FBE17E.5090609@cisco.com> <570C9586.7030905@cysols.com> <570DC523.3040907@cysols.com>
In-Reply-To: <570DC523.3040907@cysols.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.102.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090204.574E8EF9.0032, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.42, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 3ada6b75958f90a5447364c7c0924716
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/Ah1qIo2GRCR18oMbr27yFJTUWyw>
Cc: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>, "ops-ads@ietf.org" <ops-ads@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] MIBDoc review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-02.txt
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 07:30:10 -0000

Hi authors,

I saw the discussions between you and Glenn about l2l3 mvpn mib and you have already submitted the 02 version to address the comments. 

But I did not see any response to the below mvpn mib review and comments(maybe I missed something), given that we have plan to progress the mvpn-mib and l2l3-mvpn-mib documents together, what's your plan about this document?

Best regards,
Mach

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Mansfield Keeni [mailto:glenn@cysols.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 12:04 PM
> To: Benoit Claise; thomas.morin@orange.com
> Cc: ops-ads@ietf.org; Martin Vigoureux; Mach Chen; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang;
> bess@ietf.org
> Subject: MIBDoc review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-02.txt
> 
> Hi,
> I have been asked to do a MIB Doctors review of
> draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-02.txt.
> 
> The comments are attached.
> You will note that this is preliminary review. There are some generic comments
> which apply to all the scalars and tables. Please take care of those and then we
> will get onto the next phase.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> 
> Glenn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email