Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment

Tim <> Mon, 07 January 2019 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C39812DDA3 for <>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:52:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.456
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.543, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y972PV-Wu6Mu for <>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:52:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B81D312E036 for <>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id z5so2120392wrt.11 for <>; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:52:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=WlP5TrT23hxogSAxt9StkiunUWzeMabBCKVnp8S1fnw=; b=HBtfxzTqbLnJsj3h/S0bdsG9D0awVnqjFkEarIttag+isaMyEdNZhMecZ+p24Rp4EU 9vS6Aqd46PxulVHKpidtGwo98xcNINYYG01vnpFSI4YdoEyQQBpsuuOHFYfmyuHbgDfL 5dKfRpvAEnKPK3XABAD+CnusVR6jlNNhNYiD+ZJRIS5rLGCT7uKQtImWvqsbIRcnfA9Y MvO0I30Y9Ed6YiSHEK4qSrxSDBk3z7dqYYHKZ/1CP5TEURjRBqqMnklwPYYkpQbNA2Po /GmOSApJ+GCPrQj3bKr58ObZ3NwAWnAj1L5zCk1J/Mkdao40LL++qHKSpKSE0ZcY5NjE dyRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=WlP5TrT23hxogSAxt9StkiunUWzeMabBCKVnp8S1fnw=; b=KR67QuhCybIXIeTTeYj8YvrB3IetqcFfVw5WpTGShjZvW/Q/cayhyDRAbLUE1d4Afs bUicdiqoqCOhXimTv0zYHE3biqqwRkXc8LHjny3Hnh0vJC4Oy2rI4wTVQoQ2gpt0bFMt HQH5/f3GBL2jvm9VpY4mPW6GxmADlRbZYQrFCZRhJzjWSUM2vEtRWaFJaJ38Ld0UozEv 6pJo8E5CX+oCz72NGYwnhZHlF19hR8coSM+dB3npAenF0B/lr2XiFj4WM9sntHuFlf9I 4xCpkcM8dhoB7TfsRoNXAYj9OlTvfVONeVtmVAFFBl2qPzWaPU0cFtkWSuWN1jZMYVT0 81vQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcVu95bWZDfXeJEqic6XI+ap/Pi72UV3a6pzz8yiPMxDqwpYgpA rJ/Mck9d+qL2kuwal2gBmJmpaSEUzKfafw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7V20wTHVyDwh1uvFnbLJ/GQtI/YUdHGcqhcPJP9QRomJ86dXiLZLnYYBODTFR4N6DlsIQkhw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9382:: with SMTP id 2mr51970420wrp.269.1546901567930; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:52:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id p5sm6755378wmh.16.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:52:47 -0800 (PST)
To:, "" <>
References: <17128_1543833795_5C0508C3_17128_38_7_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B778825@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Tim <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 22:52:46 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <17128_1543833795_5C0508C3_17128_38_7_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B778825@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------BD6A4BE7236DD06A5354CEC0"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 22:52:53 -0000


Support this work as an individual. This document is a great and elegant 
step for EVPN towards SP network.

Some small comments by the way:

1. Figure 2 shows the scope of EVPN network but the other figures in the 
document not. Please kindly update, then it is more readable.

2. There are 2 Figure 2

3. Document is lack of mention on E-Tree, it should work without any 
extra consideration right?

4. Please fix format issue in section 8 and update TBD in section 9.



On 2018/12/3 18:43, wrote:
> Hello Working Group,
> This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on 
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment [1]
> This poll runs until *the 17th of December*.
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies 
> to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance 
> with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document 
> please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware 
> of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without 
> answers from all the Authors and Contributors.
> There is currently no IPR disclosed.
> If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please 
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].
>     Thank you,
>     Stephane & Matthew
>     [1] 
>     [2] 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list