Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-10.txt
Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> Sat, 05 September 2020 18:28 UTC
Return-Path: <ghanwani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE223A0CE3; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 11:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4L5sItuuPua; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 11:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-f44.google.com (mail-ua1-f44.google.com [209.85.222.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC353A0E85; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 11:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-f44.google.com with SMTP id z46so2992575uac.13; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 11:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ii/sb9XSrocTeuTOJesUMwPFHc5T84YuHw+1lFGADvs=; b=S8kocwJOfgfd3i/u1udRPXBCY9rpCzJhXU3agZOfZfqSjQ30t59m5OYgt3X6GD/kkk EuwM4pTvZaDi74u+WvNedLfXnXm9cx9ChIEramWs5Mk1YZFWw3JhLfn3l5XGSu+3GpNT 9Zhubh9CIBKILXwkWbcm6MiqgarcA4dquML3M66gTCuNul4lNUSpQEix4gldKoV1V439 /YdgbfhbLgAmD3CMdIrxEU5KwyxGSO4YjEfDmQffqTjmqRXmd2TgVi+EGyBQvtiAp5A7 NgG5YWWWgHWvCR/0nt+HAQRXGQxEzZ7s4FHVpRjGvGQ+TNFIdepFxY8uM79Ewt7PYKKX kk0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MmWqkni63DK9+vi4WnmvYTcfMvUxx1yytQixZibo5X39XNaKY l9fIuWxc0uqOAf05WuPHRklX3QOG2u40ScmF1mGGBYZb
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzcBhROJxZuhJ7S3epbTPklSi8PjyCwAG2Yz9UjBiW81wpsL6CsHBJsi0WfVPcmadQksdu7mV9oiaW9cxGESKo=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:d97:: with SMTP id i23mr7847409uak.99.1599330518852; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 11:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159915138535.5318.17059293511733582473@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+-tSzzxye1ihSam12NEnW_rSyMKc-KpdHXSGcbJR-gtSrVQ2g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+-tSzzxye1ihSam12NEnW_rSyMKc-KpdHXSGcbJR-gtSrVQ2g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 11:28:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+-tSzxwUTm3T2Hk0udhoxbkEg9sf8MUhSFLjk02oxmCwQq2nw@mail.gmail.com>
To: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Cc: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000746cec05ae952794"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/Bf07pDk91D1p9cVs1eest3sq0OQ>
Subject: Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-10.txt
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 18:28:44 -0000
There are also a couple of idnits, one of them being a missing reference for GENEVE. On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 11:18 AM Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: > Reading the doc, I found several editorial nits. I'm half way through and > these are the comments. If there is interest in addressing them, I will > send comments on the remainder. > > throughout > > > - document uses route type, Route Type, route type-, RT-. > > Would be good if it consistently used RT- notation throughout. > > > pg 4 > > > - VA: Virtual Appliance > > Never used in the document, suggest remove. > > > - NVGRE never used anywhere except figures. > > Suggest removing the definition and changing figures > > to show GENEVE. > > > pg 5 > > > - back-haul, back haul > > Suggest change to backhaul. > > > - vise versa -> vice versa > > > - "FW or DPI" > > Spell these out. > > > pg 6 > > > - "VLAN- Based" -> VLAN-Based > > > pg 7 > > > - "a IP-VRF via a L3 inteface called IRB interface" -> > > an IR-VRF via an L3 interace called an IRB interface. > > > - "IP-VRF is identified..." -> > > An IP-VRF is identified... > > > - "MAY" -> may > > Previous bullet does not capitalize "may" and it doesn't > > > - It would be better if, when discussing lookups, IP _DA_ and > > MAC _DA_ are mentioned rather than just IP and MAC. (We > > are looking up addresses, not protocols.) > > > - "The ingress > > PE performs a MAC lookup followed by an IP lookup and the egress PE > > performs a IP lookup followed by a MAC lookup as depicted in the > > following figure." > > This sequence applies only if there is an L3 tunnel between the > > PEs, right? If so, that should be clarified. > > > pg 9 > > > - "data planes procedures" -> data _plane_ procedures > > > - "used in description of" -> "used to describe" > > > pg 10 > > > - "Neighbor Advertisement (NA)for" > > missing a space between (NA) and for. > > > pg 11 > > > - "(VRID, range 1-255))" > > extra parenthesis > > > - several instances where MAC should be "MAC address". > > > - "These IP addresses need to be distributed as VPN > > routes" > > Does this mean EVPN route type 5? > > > - "to the PE that is attached to" -> > > to the PE that _it_ is attached to > > > pg 12 > > > - NDP cahce -> NDP cache > > > - "Router's MAC EC" > > Spell out EC. > > > pg 13 > > > - "If the MAC- VRF (and BT) exists" > > remove extra space in MAC- VRF. > > > pg 14 > > > - (MAC,IP) > > missing a space > > > - "connected route redistribution to BGP" -> > > connected route redistribution in BGP > > > - "associated MPLS/VNI values" -> > > associated MPLS label/VNI values. > > > pg 15 > > > - "MAC- VRF" > > remove extra space > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:43 AM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. >> >> Title : Integrated Routing and Bridging in EVPN >> Authors : Ali Sajassi >> Samer Salam >> Samir Thoria >> John E Drake >> Jorge Rabadan >> Filename : >> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-10.txt >> Pages : 34 >> Date : 2020-09-03 >> >> Abstract: >> Ethernet VPN (EVPN) provides an extensible and flexible multi-homing >> VPN solution over an MPLS/IP network for intra-subnet connectivity >> among Tenant Systems and End Devices that can be physical or virtual. >> However, there are scenarios for which there is a need for a dynamic >> and efficient inter-subnet connectivity among these Tenant Systems >> and End Devices while maintaining the multi-homing capabilities of >> EVPN. This document describes an Integrated Routing and Bridging >> (IRB) solution based on EVPN to address such requirements. >> >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding/ >> >> There are also htmlized versions available at: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-10 >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-10 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-10 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BESS mailing list >> BESS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess >> >
- [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-sub… internet-drafts
- Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter… Anoop Ghanwani