[bess] Re: [Idr] Re: Do we need yet another link bandwidth community?

Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> Thu, 25 July 2024 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jsnijders@fastly.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEE7C17C8BA for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZeaVK4NG5fId for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc2b.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35795C169418 for <bess@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc2b.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5cebf0b37fcso319470eaf.1 for <bess@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; t=1721876237; x=1722481037; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kARvCOFRztI4/+MCOXH/lgrOQ7SMryJR9F7RjnHe4Vk=; b=jROYcfP1jP4qEztSEpmjGcrUX78iar27FKeB96Mm1pSM/tNfkInILzJmIrA7otpBtb HOuDZgbkH2DllE17OQOgRQ4lVgKy81ajhKFM9WPtK+CB6+nVKAmxVlY8Xecoq2QOfeGj DyUL0sqZrA+9FN9r1NtLnTzSMwnMVlsua1Vw4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721876237; x=1722481037; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=kARvCOFRztI4/+MCOXH/lgrOQ7SMryJR9F7RjnHe4Vk=; b=jFIZmkl7uhY6/0mGBbKs3IoCVCJ180R1zy+EbPwRRfi33hwgMli1/LbWWQGloMhTwH XVDtiF7F6A/Uw44U6ciyDCl8aw6qDamMdPKSBp+XurZfhPRJk559Txym0FEEmIGLYpDR GhPgmi+cBd0jWrmBUR2YW8XeKeD1+n7Cty9YmgJ8o5bQczws4ijx3QG8Sphay2nSh9Rg ojkfb3J39O3N4UuaMRKuJdP2Z47MIh8wBONdyOUpEHf1iA9XIWBXxhbY/LOhlc/qEcc9 j5A+sdo3UEr8ZRVaAlUvAAWnNTxcm5zlp9ILK0giK13L49WTZNEbLeYdmb6H3sPejZvT Z+sw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw5DQQ6G64r+Nkz8Q7XVhX/i+gsIM9OuswDaKOe4PZ0TwDRQJmz z8lWrnOAeCFUHjMhmHOGwNrmOlfMB9oPSBi+fG2W+M4aJAEUqCvdPwqpBjj3r46aox7NXnGW+qz NQPeOwFK46cZx99URNyyD39SSWeX1JvMAxk1qXA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGoU+yk8930mOUHssSgHy8Q2QPTtiAdol2du0OZHZiKrDJnwBn5M1ZXemT9mABAYM7IloPrSWV2KE2ImPv2zD8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:210c:b0:5c6:658c:a9f6 with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5d5ad9f543fmr2112291eaf.2.1721876237112; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <c8b9552a1df14d3fa6fa24ac84716590@h3c.com>
In-Reply-To: <c8b9552a1df14d3fa6fa24ac84716590@h3c.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:57:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMFGGcDHuVw-d4+_cQtGSifcUYwz9dG9cv=LCros2_q17QxLnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: linchangwang <linchangwang.04414@h3c.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000075ee88061e098d30"
Message-ID-Hash: GI2RNGRBLJKR3KXMJOLQUTDYR7SM3JZO
X-Message-ID-Hash: GI2RNGRBLJKR3KXMJOLQUTDYR7SM3JZO
X-MailFrom: jsnijders@fastly.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-bess.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: BESS <bess@ietf.org>, Jeff Haas <jhaas@juniper.net>, Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>, Reshma Das <dreshma@juniper.net>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "draft-li-idr-link-bandwidth-ext@ietf.org" <draft-li-idr-link-bandwidth-ext@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, "satya.mohanty@gmail.com" <satya.mohanty@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [bess] Re: [Idr] Re: Do we need yet another link bandwidth community?
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/Cqg8O1RE7_-zbBtnNaBSXK8Gaos>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:bess-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:bess-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bess-leave@ietf.org>