Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-keyupate-bess-evpn-virtual-hub-02

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sat, 28 September 2019 00:26 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50AB120826; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0RHgRYrlORz; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84D93120AC0; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id c3so9478705qtv.10; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Qwcvow5fYku1z0QjH2GjlXIEF/qU5xuYzv6WTT7Z47s=; b=aQFrAmxtCCXFuUUlEBefJNKza2nKp0Tv6Qm+iavB629vskHGBuza6aHBtctTDyx3C8 Fe3lCUsTuyHwCTbNFspA4Oe3hTj3NM98BMYV2eHy1K2oEb3vJoXV5d+sOlSGAWADSXsG UCtgOwyPuaizEMg+RddFR6mNFGULxHz+hqEEfEZH+apTJ3n8gytwo7sJHB30ploAF0aM jSv9sIYgmvEiXSqEAyGe7Ax6BO9ymZsdbEhMgwKR+dxqVea+23rL4QSQzYiOp9ljMN59 3imnJ4k3JoyybC4hDsqCL2Ritn/dpzDebAf/nxa2VJrSngKfvU77oeKYzAGDkVjwOWAB nCBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Qwcvow5fYku1z0QjH2GjlXIEF/qU5xuYzv6WTT7Z47s=; b=fgHP8Wk1ZVW1raiwuy7mDysvwx9jq+RzB616n60Iqw+IF5xtJxLcrpns1NGLybx6P7 TKdq7R7O3gRcMXEiePsNkLOvU7k2wYHe44dauhq9UuWHSIW7d1F1gvBssF8qRZ/xCZUk FwVINW8j6oAU8oIDWeCMSyGOFfxGYieE+JL9KTsWcC99bftnmJagGiwuDPyu80W31b8a bvDeqWSL3WcyU3Bv14n5ij2MUlLjhS6hLUEGTxp29xvtn8rIvKak4ntDZvU9aK1WunmQ tncwMxeK13RjlXWpW4YxLlNkjA60EIDTmeg0q9OnGSTkIIYkyl77Oenskqi1fBNiFWXz XJoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX1zWW/A2p8GzGfAr9vzxPnQ3LYzVcEu+BrJF/qKnxoV/OrGgwS sRbudWmX63krQ7OID2FN8bMCOe4Z
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxxnXdaWjgLt7UhvcalvN5+Rvu5xgGOc/ZXKMniZn3zSfq9eebdplxIX6WXZALmaN9jDosCRw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3564:: with SMTP id z33mr13331200qtb.291.1569630394216; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1003:b003:900c:48a7:4c09:576d:1214? ([2600:1003:b003:900c:48a7:4c09:576d:1214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v85sm1928471qkb.25.2019.09.27.17.26.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusaGSM@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-264A788A-6FCE-4969-91EC-9A5E181CA85F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G102)
In-Reply-To: <CAF3QiHFe7V8ewmT179EG6QBM8BL8i5qQ_8Qg5_o6aWvESrcLyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 20:26:32 -0400
Cc: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "draft-keyupate-bess-evpn-virtual-hub@ietf.org" <draft-keyupate-bess-evpn-virtual-hub@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <29955567-9467-402F-9BE4-7246BFA742F1@gmail.com>
References: <B73B4C0F-977A-411F-B13E-67BA80F1AAEB@nokia.com> <CAF3QiHFe7V8ewmT179EG6QBM8BL8i5qQ_8Qg5_o6aWvESrcLyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Neeraj Malhotra <neeraj.ietf@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/EzKlk5K1TPGgD-lysQIt_vsy8eY>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-keyupate-bess-evpn-virtual-hub-02
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:26:42 -0000


As a technical representative of Verizon from an operator and network designer perspective I support the draft as it stands and don’t know of any non disclosed IPRs.



Regards,

Gyan S. Mishra
IT Network Engineering & Technology 
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ)
13101 Columbia Pike FDC1 3rd Floor
Silver Spring, MD 20904
United States
Phone: 301 502-1347
Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT
Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 10, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Neeraj Malhotra <neeraj.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Support adoption. 
> 
> Few comments below that may be considered for next revision following adoption:
> assume that proxy ARP behavior described in section 5.2 applies to proxy for a remote host only (not local hosts). would be good to clarify.
> Fix terminology - "PE" and "NVE" used interchangeably across the document, e.g., section 5.3. Best to use "PE" everywhere.
> Mass withdraw - consider propagating per-ES A-D routes to all V-spokes upfront as they do not result in any forwarding programming by themselves. Making advertisement / withdraw of these routes dependent on host routes advertised to remote v-spokes may result in  unnecessary complexity and exposure to race conditions.
> IRB behavior described in section 6.3 seems to be applicable to symmetric IRB only. Would be good to clarify if symmetric IRB implementation is assumed for this draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> Neeraj
> 
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:36 AM Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com> wrote:
>> This email begins a two-week poll for adoption for draft-keyupate-bess-evpn-virtual-hub-02
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document, please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR, copying the BESS mailing list. The document won't progress without answers from all the authors and contributors.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> If you are not listed as an author or a contributor, then please explicitly respond to the IPR poll only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> This poll for adoption closes on Wednesday 18th September 2019.  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Matthew and Stephane
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> BESS mailing list
>> BESS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess