Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 December 2017 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66932128954; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:08:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B3AJbfOdsyhf; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x244.google.com (mail-ot0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A55126B6D; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x244.google.com with SMTP id v21so1676000oth.6; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:08:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=H/4qidX/1vYoZsk8fjeUWzvj/c5CnEQwUCWdwH8c2mA=; b=k8hfhurso8rIQ/X+vz9bW410k6+qwy5zwpFaC5V2Wa4L0v/V8Rq3SopLRpVfy3C7Md qxZSLNQlhvQY3k6j2D9KemhYmYU1osfy80g07im9ZmozxATERhxp8lYwxqb5JL7WBCLU k3asvIlD7UjCw1XF2Dlyid0DFbNRJZnOAanauZyj82J5572UJYlZLVXTdZYMzQ0WFSDN 2247vS16FkEboqLySPQBPi3UFqK/pyybrPnh31ijEGqpqlAKKrosqLV0g7nxD6MNJVOf 0c8zTyUPdWJVwgRz2SXMt8yM3vyTGv/fcZ176IhEoiv/PkIinjkxz2ZJP/9SAhF4mgSQ kqug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H/4qidX/1vYoZsk8fjeUWzvj/c5CnEQwUCWdwH8c2mA=; b=kswjWDWjKATIF9KWfUxnfA2ohqjqmhVRvm1bvODUTyPNjmTNV/N+Y1E+4AD4Mhy7L3 CE4nJ7rllpM9QvIAJwMX+imPiJKjA2EVtmj8YDSD+yeTtDoMS8OfNrR19e2ekXB9ViJd oceqvi9F3qSXzIBUXOtPoe/6gALr2PU4gnw7U45wZfzWEv+bWB/6kUtC0gv9ITaY83uk 0YIH/peMn9oaS+1ohhWK3JIy5aYSf+OFOrdoGT4KQDHeqnUIxCrwGxiPiwhwNId/b70r kgI1ty4yU50rws3yAs735tkxbXm6m8QsAwK10QhqB2fNlWIUvwcbCofGgSTzHbLEhI0c lC9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5zx0ZK0Pt6onTSq7rBLoXv0X20lD27V6llpt7RfR8Dz9AY4cbI bHryfu1VJDc/GfFTh1hcIbzBfVOXaLqqzmm1z0Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbreoi2hGXwAUriON9pTrzKv6i326PM3DhY9gkHARktfV+AXnBi/vpyE5cVDnHpUkP7CXOFDci0E0h9k9KmwB0=
X-Received: by 10.157.56.200 with SMTP id k8mr19188587ote.3.1512511737316; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 895490483151 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:08:56 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <23037_1512483940_5A26AC64_23037_392_5_1512483939.26596.80.camel@orange.com>
References: <23037_1512483940_5A26AC64_23037_392_5_1512483939.26596.80.camel@orange.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail iOS (331)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:08:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESsy8FCTeOVGCNpfdUF9dMCuN_Mdmsz2GdLJR56sDEsHZxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, bess-chairs@ietf.org, thomas.morin@orange.com
Cc: bess@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c01f18d24988055f9f1489"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/GIWt0AIj9bT8nUb0IyUvcFh6QUc>
Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-08
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 22:08:59 -0000

On December 5, 2017 at 9:25:39 AM, thomas.morin@orange.com (
thomas.morin@orange.com) wrote:

> All,
>
> Martin Vigoureux, 2017-12-05 11:34:
>
>
> Alvaro: [...]
>
>
> What about Geneve (draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve)? The nvo3 WG is
> focusing on
> Geneve as the Standard encapsulation, but this document doesn’t
> even mention it.
>
>
> Indeed. But The decision by NVO3 to work on Geneve is fairly recent.
> I have indicated in the BESS report that we'll likely be working
> closeer
> with NVO3 from now on. An individual draft on the applicability of
> EVPN
> to NVO3 networks is targeting NVO3 WG. Conversely, an individual
> draft
> on EVPN extensions for Geneve is targeting BESS. We have agreed that
> we'll do cross reviews at the important milestones of these docs.
>
>
> Perhaps draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay could hint on such a Geneve
> work for EVPN; something like: "Adapting the EVPN control plane to the
> Geneve encapsulation is out of the scope of this document, and is
> expected to be covered in a separate document based on the same
> architectural principles"
>
Perfect, thanks!

Is that draft already in the works, or just planned?

Alvaro.