Re: [bess] 答复: 答复: Flowspec for L2VPN and E-VPN

RT overlap is a configuration issue not a protocol design issue.

It is easy to avoid it by proper RT assignment for non congruent services.

Cheers,
R.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Haoweiguo <haoweiguo@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Bertrand,
> What's your solution for RT overlap issue or other possible
> issue?Sometimes it is unfortunate that designing beauty needs to be
> compromised in reality.
> Thanks
> weiguo
>
> ________________________________________
> 发件人: Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie) [bduvivie@cisco.com]
> 发送时间: 2014年11月14日 16:00
> 收件人: Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
> 抄送: Haoweiguo; Thomas Morin; BESS; IDR Chairs
> 主题: Re: [bess] 答复:  Flowspec for L2VPN and E-VPN
>
> +1... Would to avoid to see multiplication of fs safi.
>
> Sent from iPAD
>
>
> > On Nov 14, 2014, at 01:15, Henderickx, Wim (Wim) <
> wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> >
> > If we define a new things I prefer to address the wider issue and include
> > L2 in that.
> >
> >> On 13/11/14 14:13, "Haoweiguo" <haoweiguo@huawei.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Wim,
> >> Allocating different AFI/SAFI(s) for each flow spec application is a
> >> applicable solution. Theoretically, unified mechanism for all flowspec
> >> can be designed, but it maybe a more harder work in IDR.
> >> Thanks
> >> weiguo
> >>
> >> ________________________________________
> >> 发件人: BESS [bess-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
> >> [wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com]
> >> 发送时间: 2014年11月14日 7:55
> >> 收件人: Thomas Morin; BESS
> >> 抄送: IDR Chairs
> >> 主题: Re: [bess] Flowspec for L2VPN and E-VPN
> >>
> >> As I stated in the IDR meeting my observation is that we require to many
> >> AFI/SAFI(s) for all flow spec functions. Flow spec in general is
> providing
> >> match criteria¹s with related actions. Given the proposal on Flowspec
> for
> >> L2 is new we should look at the bigger picture.
> >> In My view we need a mechanism in BGP to advertise Flowspec match
> >> criteria¹s with related actions and they should cover L2/L3-IPv4/IPv6.
> >>
> >>> On 13/11/14 13:44, "Thomas Morin" <thomas.morin@orange.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi WG,
> >>>
> >>> A heads up...
> >>>
> >>> These two drafts relate to BESS and thus may be of interest to us:
> >>> - draft-hao-idr-flowspec-l2vpn
> >>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html?draft=draft-hao-idr-flowspec-l2vpn-01> (on
> >>> idr agenda, being presented right now)
> >>> - draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn
> >>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn-00>
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> -Thomas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> BESS mailing list
> >>> BESS@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> BESS mailing list
> >> BESS@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > BESS mailing list
> > BESS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>