[bess] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 20 October 2021 21:33 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9653A12F9; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates@ietf.org, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, Zheng Zhang <zzhang_ietf@hotmail.com>, zzhang_ietf@hotmail.com, sob@sobco.com, opsdir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <163476558699.31999.8287252244204195150@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:33:07 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/KZh8QF0PwHlIyiIdV2kPCbSSEXg>
Subject: [bess] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:33:07 -0000
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Much thanks to Scott Bradner for the OpsDir review (-09), discussions and then re-review of -11. Jeffrey has agreed to change the SHOULD at the ned of S5.3.1 to a MUST (see OpsDir thread), and I'm balloting NoObj with the assumption that that will happen. Thanks again to Scott and the authors; I think that the comments since -09 have noticeably improved the document.
- [bess] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf… Warren Kumari via Datatracker