Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp

"Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" <> Wed, 14 June 2017 02:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220CE129ADE for <>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dIaQ_HXAozqm for <>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 582E3129ADC for <>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=2850; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1497407727; x=1498617327; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=5tP9Ey2xmSHDyKKvvwIGwfzH6VcdnRVJEE7tBrVnF9Y=; b=cvz8gG3XQHkLPYvaWn2feZjxVpBn2ArHwLwZLjvpDtGILel1B23S8OEU 5V24SFlDiYce3Kedw7IUXpcjdKLLCsrroqkDEbrsJit0GUR+Yd4IFZHAJ L7c4/hI4gV1IJJc0OSM4wR5PvMcIgTmAN8Fn8R7cO2sgDhfFzow1TI75K U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,340,1493683200"; d="scan'208";a="439935907"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jun 2017 02:35:26 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5E2ZQsk029831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:35:26 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:35:25 -0400
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 22:35:25 -0400
From: "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" <>
To: Martin Vigoureux <>, BESS <>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp
Thread-Index: AQHS5Lbg/JdL5IJN7UeXoZ+oQhLxAA==
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:35:25 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.22.0.170515
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:35:29 -0000


Patrice Brissette

    On 6/12/17, 9:27 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" < on behalf of> wrote:
    >Hello Working Group,
    >This email starts a Working Group Last Call on 
    >draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-02 [1] which is considered mature and ready 
    >for a final working group review.
    >¤ Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent
    >version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than
    >*26th of June*.
    >Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is 
    >also a call for support (or not) to publish this document as a Proposed 
    >Standard RFC.
    >¤ *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that 
    >applies to draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp, to ensure that IPR has been 
    >disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 
    >and 5378 for more details).
    >If you are listed as a document Author or Contributor of
    >draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-02 please respond to this email and indicate 
    >whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
    >Note that, as of today, no IPR has been disclosed against this document 
    >or its earlier versions.
    >¤ We are also polling for knowledge of implementations of part or all of 
    >what this document specifies. This information is expected as per [2]. 
    >Please inform the mailing list, or the chairs, or only one of the chairs.
    >Thank you,
    >BESS mailing list
    BESS mailing list