Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 25 September 2017 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBD7134461; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QaybZBYLfAir; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 791C4134338; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v8PETID2004795; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:29:19 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (196.252.114.87.dyn.plus.net [87.114.252.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v8PETFYU004729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:29:16 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Martin Vigoureux'" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, <bess@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway@ietf.org>
References: <a84d470d-6cea-677b-0b2f-6497de3770af@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <a84d470d-6cea-677b-0b2f-6497de3770af@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:29:13 +0100
Message-ID: <00d501d3360a$aac115f0$004341d0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQEuvJVugDiscdh0LZdeYdpuK68REqQOmqTw
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.1.0.1062-23350.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.392-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.392-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: +c13yJDs900wJ6xbTjBa5v9WgQ5yFeIpC/ExpXrHizzkl3D9w/Qcz8V+ 5HapY//Lglywce3zy9uh0PGu4bIvd5z3nEP4SjjAytPf0+gM21Y4WsSNiH/UXqzFQLYFPhyyZ+M 1RPx3UL4NWdlmVcmSLZGTpe1iiCJqtD9qpBlNF8qWlioo2ZbGwdmzcdRxL+xwKrauXd3MZDUTOb /NDngSJYINxU4a3NRNSghT43m2+erLYfoaSrKlW2Ms19/m2R08zVkLdDMzmF3yjlAovXt82blLg jA2nVihGweXXQ5eG6NzjVc+NcYyR6fItuohgjfnw/3NmPJsa4pNWfnUnboMLyBJEZlhLWrQQwym txuJ6y0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/MHXVcHgz_k5KYB8C_wI7kyCVuWk>
Subject: Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:29:46 -0000

Hi Martin,

I'm not aware of any IPR associated with this draft.

Best,
Adrian

> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies
> to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance
> with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more
> details).
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers
> from all the Authors and Contributors.
> 
> Currently no IPR has been disclosed against this Document.
> 
> If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet
> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.