Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-04

Eric C Rosen <erosen52@gmail.com> Mon, 11 January 2021 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <erosen52@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE013A14DC; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:11:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id REpkSmpPW8rj; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:11:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D463A14DA; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:11:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id z5so16384909iob.11; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:11:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=nlNCuQxpd5IaYcZp5vHPYbfBAeQronSV2c7rI4g7/1Q=; b=YkR+GR9Hcggm8A8c8GmVG4mbEQ+PgSNvILpf2hFUZO8W6lL6QbQw7+Lmr6YqVuDOHf ONg5w9j4fqlSVqIBDohzmR+ZDrva+dpg6nY2UysQc1+G9n/sqbFhncfHfpWjUtdY4yHt J7ssLEyZJ0pv2QRbFDqu+e5GEMNOpWNAkUWF6iWK89ZDw8h5JV51nPIXo+AWBzoZ+lLb eEYieeda7zWXzGxdjuKuLLQmZPm3214fbrKTuNn/eXbvyFp8HqerfwJuSxNtCobrGlIt TBmiK5MMiYAKoPwhw+RRukM+D+0Z5pxRCSID4awHatmvM6NfzET00dwYSkdhiwt9/DX6 pg3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=nlNCuQxpd5IaYcZp5vHPYbfBAeQronSV2c7rI4g7/1Q=; b=Rmou8JB7JB7TRWOgOiIg4LnfoY6aVgvI/isFyQ7bf2Fq8TRQMhEXAYxwmQ/3fGHPbM 5OZY4FZCYTIDkKEygkDQT6ycxOVv1u8JEO0rtdSAB9yeArmMJlWbkGbot118C+6BLZ6p cQQ8rUqtPimLDTbgOKCsNMmdKWmoyMbrOSLvAUApCQ1DTiWPG4J1Q2TuhabW+TtFcXem TIe8t6189eOUv7Va+D/xg8eDpqs6GjKdHxAaQyTqV0KDD7zol2vZH6Ex0Tl+L2R5HVEM MuB/Xc5NuzFjjdAZjJtzOd4aWcRN7bYd4qk8kFDMz9hrLwAykqUmialLFK3EC197xYLE 4sPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316n+tcyjaFjR3lO0va5buO+iZYNd6A9yWm7vyu78dyVAlzzyXo O5keRMz0uv4dAsQWOygKn30=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6olniqqjVR/FFIY4PEAVbIMAiddyUbDc7cZuvXdPZQ8B7Xwuw9Agyn6P/YRqVbNXUmXkJDg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:296:: with SMTP id c22mr12737489jaq.65.1610334692097; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:11:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:19c:4500:1026:89d1:3ada:9722:ac4d? ([2601:19c:4500:1026:89d1:3ada:9722:ac4d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n11sm9813091ioh.37.2021.01.10.19.11.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:11:31 -0800 (PST)
To: slitkows.ietf@gmail.com, draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-chairs@ietf.org
References: <059101d6cfd5$c53029e0$4f907da0$@gmail.com> <MWHPR08MB352087900A75C7FA2BD41AF1F7C70@MWHPR08MB3520.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <004201d6e286$63dcad30$2b960790$@gmail.com>
From: Eric C Rosen <erosen52@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2bda96da-8088-873f-75f2-2664263bf47b@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:11:30 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <004201d6e286$63dcad30$2b960790$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0525EAB85EDBF1CF43F172D5"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/N4A7vLr602_svXrMEx9H9F_uGaQ>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-04
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 03:11:35 -0000

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR relevant to this document.

- Eric


On 1/4/21 5:43 AM, slitkows.ietf@gmail.com wrote:
>
> We are still missing couple of IPR replies to close the WGLC: Eric, 
> Ice (their email contact has to be updated).
>
> In addition, we haven’t received any reply regarding an existing 
> implementation. Is anyone aware of an implementation ?
>
> Brgds,
>
> Stephane
>
> *From: *BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org>> on 
> behalf of slitkows.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> 
> <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>>
> *Date: *Friday, December 11, 2020 at 4:53 PM
> *To: *draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label@ietf.org 
> <mailto:draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label@ietf.org> 
> <draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label@ietf.org 
> <mailto:draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label@ietf.org>>, 
> bess@ietf.org <mailto:bess@ietf.org> <bess@ietf.org 
> <mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
> *Cc: *bess-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:bess-chairs@ietf.org> 
> <bess-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:bess-chairs@ietf.org>>
> *Subject: *[bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for 
> draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-04
>
> This email starts a two-week working group last call for 
> draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-04 [1]
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, 
> please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards 
> track RFC.
>
> This poll runs until the 28^th December 2020
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies 
> to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance 
> with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document 
> please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware 
> of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without 
> answers from all the Authors and Contributors.
>
> There is currently one IPR disclosure.
>
> In addition, we are polling for knowledge of implementationsof this 
> draft, per the BESS policy in [2].
>
> Thank you,
>
> Matthew & Stephane
>
> [1]https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label/> 
>
>
> [2]https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw 
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw>
>