Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment

<stephane.litkowski@orange.com> Mon, 17 December 2018 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2FE12872C for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:54:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aiTFPTuYS39e for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orange.com (mta135.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CADBB1286E7 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 04:54:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.71]) by opfednr25.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 43JLhh1BfdzCrxS for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:54:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.62]) by opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 43JLhg744lzFpX2 for <bess@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:54:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::65de:2f08:41e6:ebbe]) by OPEXCLILM5E.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::6958:931c:a396:f51e%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:54:38 +0100
From: <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment
Thread-Index: AdSK9MoVutPXDdgmS+OMrGu2oHHStwLEptGQ
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:54:37 +0000
Message-ID: <7578_1545051284_5C179C94_7578_408_1_1749d600-0efb-4b68-b2b4-99d469ca024c@OPEXCLILM5E.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <17128_1543833795_5C0508C3_17128_38_7_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B778825@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <17128_1543833795_5C0508C3_17128_38_7_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B778825@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.2]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_1749d6000efb4b68b2b499d469ca024cOPEXCLILM5Ecorporateadr_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/NJqpxeC8BnTYNNEvB6no-s_853c>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:54:49 -0000

Hi,

The WGLC poll is now ended.
We have one comment from Mankamana that requires a reply from the authors.

We are also missing an IPR reply from Richard Schnell from Verizon.

We can't proceed before clearing these two points.

Brgds,

Stephane



From: BESS [mailto:bess-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkowski@orange.com
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2018 11:43
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment


Hello Working Group,



This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment [1]



This poll runs until *the 17th of December*.



We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.



There is currently no IPR disclosed.



If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.



We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].



    Thank you,

    Stephane & Matthew



    [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment/



    [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

--- Begin Message ---
Support.





But I would be happy to see some changes if WG / Author agree to it.



Nits:

1.      Please move abstract to the top. It would be easy for readers.
2.      It might be good to add a line to describe I-SID in terminology section






3.2<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-00#section-3.2>.2>. Scalability




   (R2a) A PE MUST handle thousands or tens of thousands of Single-homed
   vES's on a single physical port (e.g., single ENNI)


Comment: These section provides number “thousands or ten thousands”. As a standard document, I think we can avoid using some hard code numbers.

Would it be more appropriate to say “A PE MUST handle multiple Single-homed vES’s

on a single physical port (e.g., single ENNI)



   (R2b) A PE MUST handle hundreds of Single-Active vES's on a single
   physical port (e.g., single ENNI)
Comment: Same as above

   (R2c) A PE MAY handle tens or hundreds of All-Active Multi-Homed
   vES's on a single physical port (e.g., single ENNI)
Comment: Same as above






Thanks

Mankamana





From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
Date: Monday, December 3, 2018 at 2:43 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment



Hello Working Group,



This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment [1]



This poll runs until *the 17th of December*.



We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.



There is currently no IPR disclosed.



If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.



We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].



    Thank you,

    Stephane & Matthew



    [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment/



    [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw





_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
--- End Message ---