Re: [bess] Comments about draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-03

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 06 April 2021 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A283A2F12; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id decdjD1PEFOY; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476543A2F15; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id k8so14464751iop.12; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8dQJgnFPOuziBwrl/KxqEtA9lewV10/V91/yez4GOUY=; b=JnN15GPHuNWf5fOOO5JQv/EitIKkXyAlvo14kIBRK9PcaUU1X52ZAxD/LWhnoiqRy9 W0CgqZfEDNRCUaBiz1hlqTh+A7VXC1Q1G/XbG9Vv/p8C4VWc0HtUsaFpYnkx76UYj8Pz eo/+H7Hi6W7Hmv4ZhkMCiGqBLayU6IY6PD/WFt1AJ1sOWMoRlMj5yWeaCHQcm5J0hy+k 4J5uq6eREUIXlUflg3ApoUgMIo7zDLlsGNajrCeAsJ6qc5id1GfONu/SsKMYBoTVkVH7 Qw3XZ4NTXYRvHHNXAX1LSEwyUTnwh/of5obj0we25RyeMOtgqkFNpmwodGuFBvGnFHGl lhdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8dQJgnFPOuziBwrl/KxqEtA9lewV10/V91/yez4GOUY=; b=cNgMRnp9XX7eAg4E0/Mlp7+M/woEWdcJi+0E1SfNzjB49WGYQin20gwQ3lFGOgvJxm 2ej3iO4HUMCnJlwdOdZ2u3p4zpRwYZwwEkeeWJ1isIsFyLrkQQLThJJ/9Wbu2jedc6OA OHN2G6y80SMyKng+nS5TGYgckIhKS6nHkT1/T2wITUzLZOrtOIBzdnQjsGcRZBNap1Ar QJpW3xPTR9SKzh0+aDkMK+fc25kjQco1b6MQea0jBb1Bgn5UoNL2wan4OMydaLq9z/hb ODtJyaleAJX1Abq5YM0RB+05r618a71n8Z/NoXt+G6QlwTzG9WNMdekGtNUKksmE4BIS 8Miw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336DtQCNb9zdp/MynqgSxDamiHhXRZPa4vzXjne9ciN/sGVIVHv jGUfUYi2ZxBH2M5BaC9wCEpWysc1stJK1RV7JS3jy7uPR04=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWCMwiKXAyZ5MsSiCIekW7GoZHOVgiM38vvuuxu0rR0l9VBGNLqqK+SbBE+sHHHpRlZpJW2hYajrhtUq6j/OY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:2711:: with SMTP id m17mr30543852jav.115.1617740265554; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MWHPR08MB3520F396283A2D8D472F6BE7F7939@MWHPR08MB3520.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR08MB3520F396283A2D8D472F6BE7F7939@MWHPR08MB3520.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 16:17:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEEQtw3SEUD6j0qxLptCXqXkcJQYNdU2Ff5x6Ocq6aYhyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/OmTTl6d6NmAJfULJmYVRokk5Ap8>
Subject: Re: [bess] Comments about draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-03
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 20:17:52 -0000

Hi Jorge,

Thanks for your comments. Sorry for the delay in responding. Please see
below.

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:21 AM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain
View) <jorge.rabadan@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> Dear authors,
>
> (Most of) these comments were made during the last IETF as
> well. Thank you in advance for considering them.

My apologies for missing things.

> About fault detection for unicast:
>
>    By default, it advertises this discriminator with
>    BGP using the BFD Discriminator Attribute [ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-
>    failover] with BFD Mode TBD4 in an EVPN MAC/IP Advertisement Route
>    [RFC7432] and extracts its peer's discriminator from such an
>    attribute.
>
> In typical EVPN deployments there are no MAC/IP advertisement routes
> advertised by a PE until the PE does not learn a MAC for a locally
> attached host. Based on the text above, the operator cannot
> establish BFD session against an EVPN PE that has not learn a local
> MAC yet.
>
> Is that the intent? Or is the intend to advertise a local management
> MAC for the purpose of distributing the BFD discriminator required
> for unicast fault detection? Or is it the MAC allocated in section
> 8.2?
>
> Please add text is missing to clarify this.

Yes, we will add text and update the draft to support BFD sessions
between PEs independent of the advertisement of locally attached host
MAC addresses.

> Unicast mpls encapsulation
>
> - The destination IP port MUST be 3784 [RFC5881].
>
>
> s/IP port/UDP port/

OK. "source IP port" in the following line also needs to be fixed and
there are a few other places in the draft that just say "source port"
or "destination port" and could be clarified by adding "UDP".

> The draft does not support BDF for IP multicast traffic in EVPN networks
>
> Is this intended?
> Are you planning to address this gap? If so, text is needed and the
> discriminator added to S-PMSI A-D routes.

Yes, we will add text and update the draft to support BFD for IP BUM
traffic in EVPN networks including adding BFD discriminator attribute
to additional routes as needed.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

> Thanks.
> Jorge