Re: [bess] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-08

[Ketan Talaulikar <[e-mail]>]

Hi Roni,

Thanks for your review and your comments. We will re-organize the text in
the introduction section as suggested by you for a better flow - this will
be posted in the next update.

Regarding the terminology section, we've followed the practice of expanding
in-line on first use. Note that this document does not really introduce a
new terminology but references and uses them from other documents (with
references provided).

Thanks,
Ketan


On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 15:05, Roni Even via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-??
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review Date: 2021-11-22
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-24
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary:
> The document is ready for publication as a standard track rfc with
> editorial
> comment.
>
> Major issues:
>
> Minor issues:
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
> An editorial comment: I suggest that the introduction section will start
> with
> the description of the protocol. it can use the text from the abstract
> with the
> text from the last two paragraph of the introspection section that should
> move
> to the start of the section. The definitions / terminology should follow
> or be
> in a sub section.
>
>
>