[bess] [Errata Verified] RFC9573 (8451)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 10 June 2025 10:54 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: bess@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bess@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6E2A331D121; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 03:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id 9418125FD7C; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 03:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: laburdet.ietf@gmail.com, zzhang@juniper.net, erosen52@gmail.com, wlin@juniper.net, lizhenbin@huawei.com, ice@braindump.be
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20250610105452.9418125FD7C@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: max-recipients
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-bess.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
Message-ID-Hash: E47ICUAJ2V4XQDJZADTRLXDRJHO2Y6AS
X-Message-ID-Hash: E47ICUAJ2V4XQDJZADTRLXDRJHO2Y6AS
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 06:24:22 -0700
CC: gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com, iesg@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [bess] [Errata Verified] RFC9573 (8451)
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/PkrHpeNiTclHlr9PeFnFYlR9YIw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:bess-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:bess-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bess-leave@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:54:53 -0000
X-Original-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 03:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
The following errata report has been verified for RFC9573, "MVPN/EVPN Tunnel Aggregation with Common Labels". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8451 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Luc André Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2025-06-05 Verified by: Gunter Van de Velde (IESG) Section: 4.1 Original Text ------------- 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 0x03 or 0x43 | 8 | ID-Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ID-Value | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Corrected Text -------------- 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 0x03 | 0x08 | ID-Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ID-Value | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Notes ----- Text describes the EC as Transitive Opaque only - 0x03 (Also minor change to '8' -> 0x08 resembling format in IANA's allocation table) Indeed also IANA has NOT allocated non-transitive EC subtype: https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-extended-communities/bgp-extended-communities.xhtml#trans-opaque https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-extended-communities/bgp-extended-communities.xhtml#non-trans-opaque -------------------------------------- RFC9573 (draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-14) -------------------------------------- Title : MVPN/EVPN Tunnel Aggregation with Common Labels Publication Date : May 2024 Author(s) : Z. Zhang, E. Rosen, W. Lin, Z. Li, IJ. Wijnands Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : BGP Enabled ServiceS Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [bess] [Errata Verified] RFC9573 (8451) RFC Errata System