Re: [bess] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7582 (6875)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Tue, 08 March 2022 22:32 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220308085236.39844F5D35@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:32:13 -0800
Cc: erosen@juniper.net, ice@cisco.com, yiqunc@microsoft.com, arjen@boers.com, bess@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E20BF3A2-7376-42BE-93F9-F6616A4553E4@amsl.com>
References: <20220308085236.39844F5D35@rfc-editor.org>
To: "<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/Sz_Jg6nOl187NIoTXPkBrux1RG4>
Subject: Re: [bess] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7582 (6875)
Precedence: list

Greetings,

Errata (6875) has been deleted.  Please resubmit your errata with the correct RFC number.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
> Subject: RE: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7582 (6875)
> Date: March 8, 2022 at 1:18:56 AM PST
> To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> Cc: "erosen@juniper.net" <erosen@juniper.net>et>, "ice@cisco.com" <ice@cisco.com>om>, "yiqunc@microsoft.com" <yiqunc@microsoft.com>om>, "arjen@boers.com" <arjen@boers.com>
> 
> Dear RFC Editor, 
> 
> This errata is against RFC7285, not 7582. Can you please update the RFC number? Thank you.
> 
> Authors of RFC7582, apologies for the inconvenience. 
> 
> Cheers,
> Med


> On Mar 8, 2022, at 12:52 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7582,
> "Multicast Virtual Private Network (MVPN): Using Bidirectional P-Tunnels".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6875
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
> 
> Section: 14.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>                    +------------+--------------------+
>                    | Identifier | Intended Semantics |
>                    +------------+--------------------+
>                    | pid        | See Section 7.1.1  |
>                    | priv:      | Private use        |
>                    +------------+--------------------+
> 
>                   Table 4: ALTO Endpoint Property Types
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>                    +------------+--------------------+
>                    | Identifier | Intended Semantics |
>                    +------------+--------------------+
>                    | pid        | See Section 7.1.1  |
>                    +------------+--------------------+
> 
>                   Table 4: ALTO Endpoint Property Types
> 
> Notes
> -----
> priv is not an identifier, but a prefix.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7582 (draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Multicast Virtual Private Network (MVPN): Using Bidirectional P-Tunnels
> Publication Date    : July 2015
> Author(s)           : E. Rosen, IJ. Wijnands, Y. Cai, A. Boers
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : BGP Enabled ServiceS
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

[bess] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7582 (6875) RFC Errata System
Re: [bess] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7582 (6… Chris Smiley