[bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04.txt
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 24 November 2014 19:27 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DB81A8716; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:27:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9hu-vqW3t_q; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:27:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09FE21A8708; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:27:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sAOJRDi9002940; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:27:13 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sAOJRCxC002923 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:27:12 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:27:10 -0000
Message-ID: <07be01d0081c$a4af4200$ee0dc600$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdAIHJynO3+jXSsATjCc8jLasmz/Zw==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-21128.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--16.307-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--16.307-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: niNZIUnHKUHZZ7BZ4UeyMHBRIrj8R47FUAjrAJWsTe8CsxyhR8y7Cc/k IBS+NhDEsxJ+RzFClMSd1cJ+ghnpuCWvhQBtQUwTu72KpAktHS9A8JZETQujwo5t/XRqktxJwua niM9QXy256cTx4sb1VGM9t0Ri1OZlfPmUQQG69pwX2N9OpwN26I+YVJqrrEz4N2d3n0B/sI8h+B yDknIgCPT/Twd2X1dqTdQXwxyJtjyip6xhGipIWQPRhGX0wT3lej8QyNOlLR2ynk7TnYzMumFwm oC00lhIac16DD67Q7UJtmn+NVQTo8H1IF95UDDc71Wx2uUbPLcfXzVgO0hVquTqs5BN/8M2bX2A zWAMkZzi8zVgXoAltlwtzewu2M63VkVZa47CjvDdB/CxWTRRu25FeHtsUoHuVG2dDLygUouAKLC y8D31qJa9ov52M7KFuLhP1FUKs98chXTZ3Wukbw==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/TuFeagGxe_K-9_XUf69lAjD20r0
Cc: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04.txt
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:27:17 -0000
This document contains a worked example using IP addresses from the 10/8 and 192.168/16 Private Use spaces. It would be far better if the document used addresses from the three documentation/test spaces 192.0.2/24 198.51.100/24 and 203.0.113/24 Unless you can provide a strong reason not to make this change (which looks to me like it would be a simple matter), please do so in a new revision after IETF last call. Thanks, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The > IESG > Sent: 24 November 2014 15:57 > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: bess@ietf.org > Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04.txt> (BGP-signaled end- > system IP/VPNs.) to Proposed Standard > > > The IESG has received a request from the BGP Enabled Services WG (bess) > to consider the following document: > - 'BGP-signaled end-system IP/VPNs.' > <draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-04.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-12-08. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > This document contains a normative Downref to RFC 1027 > > Abstract > > This document describes a solution in which the control plane > protocol specified in BGP/MPLS IP VPNs is used to provide a Virtual > Network service to end-systems. These end-systems may be used to > provide network services or may directly host end-to-end > applications. > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
- [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-sys… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end… Benson Schliesser
- Re: [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end… Benson Schliesser
- Re: [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end… Pedro Marques
- Re: [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end… Benson Schliesser
- Re: [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end… Thomas Morin
- Re: [bess] Last Call Comment draft-ietf-l3vpn-end… Thomas Morin