IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc

Luc André Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 28 September 2021 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A033A081B; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2FJY6M3ckgCI; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F093A0818; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id l8so37522229edw.2; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:accept-language:content-language:mime-version; bh=dg2U5eXgQgCz2ogCKgAKdPQvE7CvxXbt3n6Dbryzo9s=; b=K0T5kmHNn2Ra97dyY3GIBqqUw7TIsBTYW7eC1gD7CIKscuFc/zQUVNPxbNIrEJH8qd a9RNlSnGfIcKZage/v0CTvuhurlFLBW+nt/6jrBd9THNlbg+vNKBl97M6P/HPeJrE4EW EZVGW8Kg7xMHgpFoEuakoYQc2ct0DRz8LCovtfGGrDY6RiZ/SL2Z7u6burDNPOXTfEAS 4QNOGc33L9vRd1WhwHyUtPu5H1N0ZvI/odWESbA4MCc3HAnSuggijhPDIZmb33rbpp6l 46//yVFZl6kx9joMAJ5Y3XFgrVSPGXpmEJwTKqo3DHu6P836FcEaaWv3/3s0MzIYZHU5 8XAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=dg2U5eXgQgCz2ogCKgAKdPQvE7CvxXbt3n6Dbryzo9s=; b=3y51UEN3/QGPPuFQX8Nilsd9TKPf0FRiXJuPM2H8yGndZJ7pR9x2HyTbAhN6bcmNyc rCj2Ixa9WYvL/VVhjKe5cmStq4t0EAhcPrfq3uAjhj5MBbZ3O8FGDqsQ3vic3pOAmjIy mHj4YJ/DMD5jWzP5hZiHTJOJBcIkWP4dKUjk4/kkV7HzMl92OkfAzniWuuHaSJmpHnd9 153+UKC7gk/4RsLszvjMf2pT/zTteWj06CvaoM5Ssc3fKoMcspTFHtNLm6ZLaQpSLr4c /bsWrAbEso25ZobZ28gUgcHsm71mdqdWZfxAJfy8pkiYZ7PnEzg27OlVuEpz2yTf5c7K CqeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5314DUrHEwyklmjr2Zvi39/eSohPx66BKK1Sj4aerZOdDGaH6sfk CBMmDc/kzhvEEFLec1pvOB6y6qcklOE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFW5bcKOLbrEJNfnDeCx5kjLF7MPqR8JaZAvO9NuWWHoEvQe8G3iJ8ueC4QsHM3H3B2kfGbw==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:e081:: with SMTP id f1mr9533394edl.65.1632852453094; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DF4PR8401MB0650.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([2a01:111:f400:7509::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bm26sm10986818ejb.16.2021.09.28.11.07.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Luc_Andr=E9_Burdet?= <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "slitkows.ietf@gmail.com" <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>, 'BESS' <bess@ietf.org>
CC: "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc
Thread-Index: Ade0LjdTzfSI7bTPSkSpdAkxvW/1Kw==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:07:30 +0000
Message-ID: <DF4PR8401MB0650CA91D6DBF627CB715285AFA89@DF4PR8401MB0650.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <010901d7b42e$6b3c7ae0$41b570a0$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DF4PR8401MB0650CA91D6DBF627CB715285AFA89DF4PR8401MB0650_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/W4j9DHjW1rOzD2UfxJvYqGt4KZk>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:07:44 -0000

I support publication ;  Cisco / IOS-XR has implemented this draft

Regards,
Luc André

Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  |  laburdet.ietf@gmail.com  |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814


From: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 02:02
To: 'BESS' <bess@ietf.org>
Cc: <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc


Hi,



This email starts a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc [1]



Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please indicate if you support publishing the draft as a Standards Track RFC.



This poll runs until the 12th October 2021.



We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).



If you are listed as an author or a contributor of this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The document won't progress without answers from all the authors and contributors.

There are currently two IPR disclosures.



In addition, we are polling for knowledge of implementations of this draft, per the BESS policy in [2].



Thank you,

Matthew & Stephane





[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc/

[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email