[bess] A question to the Authors of draft-wang-bess-sbfd-discriminator
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 28 October 2021 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662A83A1086; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqPdpdt2EUz1; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61F43A1085; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id z20so29703550edc.13; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=p5QuXLb4KcbuRvB/lQz7gsE4txucFUz9ctTb5MAJzEU=; b=OyO2zo1xCMYWSlvt0jZh7iBv8vVVb2oxtTj2VQ99+IWXpmFVad/PO3X7ndDicv8dTG qmORu6VpvIyTwPxogQKaivD5pDQkAjv5Is/4q/SJHiuuIvcryIzMQ20zWAwKgqdy72IE 1SPoGWXe9eOs2dIt+mH1QCR62NyAC/LA23LfrU10Oo8fSC/Dm+05FlDLhO18SNu9xH3L QwJt+TCKV+iVdoEUOZc/UszsbPCFyYwUgF/Cl3Vc5+bjg79sVS/CQIm5ms0laG5ZdGmE q1uAWzXBzO6dwzYJf2ME5djQm8ufkr4rz4ZhPJVuT4S9NsfOrSjD6Sdd4VGvm8La/pYZ a0SQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=p5QuXLb4KcbuRvB/lQz7gsE4txucFUz9ctTb5MAJzEU=; b=ffAwKf+4XIAPzQA1ZZM1cyzZCd6GkqE3M0E6sF+OUqdxtHdryi07ii88c3Cuz1OEXq lcP4AVxiLnPe2TfF04RGnNV9UySDumKgA9Gm/lrHMwVYwJv/BDlegMjrw4paiNr9r9i5 tj1lcuz2w3BxWCBYZUQAvvh9D3FbmlCoP6WzD6+++9+jKr0AhMWC/l31eSkaO93TcH5h qGQdqBxe6B9F1i46MpAyesghfcIMtQAcOKYNS2jQP5GnYsjYKGS9eVqnTNFScoNPNfyC k/mMnx6+hSNnS9uEHRcKHaw212VAjSlSsXCvTuSZu1Gt4zHnaXwDuSpTQF+wAEAkB3+Z Tksw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gjjignCRwmJnga7IFqgwodD6HsOTD5QUd/rtfz3OQQlSGKBVe uPOEx7Nku1JO9wyaIjP1cbdFt3niPb1vNb6gxScjK370cDU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznJJR/jMki+DnYyVjfbvVyQNh27t8YRrdFyS6ZL2GMdFCI5A/vmSqRPe3EF1CsT6phghwIY6wMgXkroGrIjac=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:8744:: with SMTP id 4mr8855785edv.100.1635450860156; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:54:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmWrGcBDMsjd_2nPsLLHH=zeEnFAvRMbuC4rE-5LV0Az+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions@ietf.org, BESS <bess@ietf.org>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000913ae205cf6f1392"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/WCYYbqKjXoDw0CsQwENx1LhE1gs>
Subject: [bess] A question to the Authors of draft-wang-bess-sbfd-discriminator
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:54:31 -0000
Dear Authors, thank you for bringing your work to the BESS WG. I've read the draft and couldn't find a reference to the IDR WG draft that, as it seems to me, addresses the same problem - draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions/>. Could you take a look at the IDR draft and share your thoughts? Do you find that anything is missing in the draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions? Regards, Greg
- [bess] A question to the Authors of draft-wang-be… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] A question to the Authors of draft-wan… Wanghaibo (Rainsword)
- Re: [bess] A question to the Authors of draft-wan… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] A question to the Authors of draft-wan… Wanghaibo (Rainsword)
- Re: [bess] A question to the Authors of draft-wan… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [bess] A question to the Authors of draft-wan… Wanghaibo (Rainsword)
- Re: [bess] A question to the Authors of draft-wan… Greg Mirsky