IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bess] REG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpnvpwstest/

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Tue, 01 October 2019 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA83912012C; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQ0_ukrxddaf; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 982BD120089; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id u22so13045657qkk.11; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=cX5J3q10YGZPqz1+Rzas4JJVbD1xtJsluAkB3u1L3ns=; b=khfIsjXP0cfW/etu2xJfSI13wQcrioWHPRGWXAXD0IL2lT/VnCctNd/oIVi+RtNwjv W6yxT1kn6twmYlBaUXWGTRF7aycgTTGRsU1qme6CSBnWPsijQNtmvPs6RNH8k0vEu+P8 9iOYF47Wve7PmT1UgNa5ymjHppJbYhUqwGZN+JXeqjXWDiutoAv6TlYWsNDUOof2oCg5 qCnNsLiNAclvCzU+5cTnmLN/8qZPDtiMMrs21uw52UD2H7XABUBX6cDqnxJwPtsLPoN3 OIEbmWq+OqJpNpn/vXD5BR1zA++tBnUbtmW6J0tzYlT/rJbshSBwgH5ymynw2/3w8gO0 FJDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=cX5J3q10YGZPqz1+Rzas4JJVbD1xtJsluAkB3u1L3ns=; b=DK5rLz2KksOYQldRW6A+PxuglpJZN9L7f0oJwvFc+aaZzQmMwHM0+hDyD9eCty1Lev 1vwVje6x7ylciyDCG++akQHuL4M12WiLCMzr0ilLsu788so6rnzbUdu8sHH/t8Gn3OED 6u3ds/0H/d9sNb+qsfRmZ9q6pLgqewRigA1HPhLD3r2SHW6mvEWOnadpkoampEi92Kfb Lw0NXE25U7RL8IOyJBj7tiX4u9LxGcQKTANdytn/dVyFcn5zvzfGKhAZ3NER0iXvgAo5 90lgQOSPrNfCSQVIE9xQcqn1E6NFQp0LGj1dv8opSdYQjkQFIA2bfsX7/HLZPfH/3WfK wbMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXXNWYb2vNDUmnbG+vUdQSP1O9xFxWNDZo40pJMcDbTtT0KBjkc KPwAoXJcqLssWUBG5+CRcJH0P7+p01s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRYbRuU8ofzBekUsHVAq0mg/C1LWcdQmTli7CmppSnN2xLHLUnCJWwcNElMfl0/LXGudzKJw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4c54:: with SMTP id z81mr836140qka.18.1569972428088; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.213] (pool-72-83-194-140.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [72.83.194.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c201sm8669854qke.128.2019.10.01.16.27.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusaGSM@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-222133D4-0941-4854-BCA1-2A54A3D6330A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G102)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR05MB6208DB6F4D86BFB3BF386D82C29D0@MN2PR05MB6208.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 19:27:07 -0400
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <088539F6-9FED-4334-BB35-B821990F86A1@gmail.com>
References: <MN2PR05MB620825B782549E502D60F8F2C28B0@MN2PR05MB6208.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <EA6584A5-EA8B-442D-B8A8-DD1DA39B2DD3@gmail.com> <MN2PR05MB6208EAB3BD0085BC21349AACC2820@MN2PR05MB6208.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR05MB6208DB6F4D86BFB3BF386D82C29D0@MN2PR05MB6208.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Sudhin Jacob <sjacob@juniper.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/YVemz2zgT8o_BvNpKfs-XQTvaV0>
Subject: Re: [bess] REG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpnvpwstest/
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 23:27:13 -0000

Thank you Sudhin

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 1, 2019, at 12:48 AM, Sudhin Jacob <sjacob@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Gyan,
>  
> Kindly find the answers inline. Appreciate your feedback.
>  
> Regards,
> Sudhin
>  
> Juniper Business Use Only
> From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> 
> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2019 9:02 PM
> To: Sudhin Jacob <sjacob@juniper.net>
> Cc: bmwg@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [bess] REG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpnvpwstest/
>  
>  
>  
> 
> Which Juniper platform was the testing done on?
>  
> Sudhin>>>>>>> This draft is for benchmarking EVPN-VPWS service, we are defining a set of parameters for the same. This can be done on any platforms which supports EVPN.
>  
> 
> Also in the drawing you have the RR / Core router.
>  
> Can you modify the drawing so it depicts a typical SP environment with separate PE and P in the data plane LSP path and RR sitting separately serving control plane function out of the data plane.
>  
> Sudhin>>>>> sure we will work on it.
>  
> In the core mpls and this is pbb-evpn over mpls analogous to vxlan evpn in DC space.
>  
> Sudhin>>>>> This service is different, it is a point to point service like ELINE.
>  
> Is evpn-vpws Junipers version of Cisco pbb-evpn?
>  
> Sudhin>>>> No, PBB-EVPN is different. EVPN-VPWS is a point to point service as I mentioned above. In EVPN-VPWS service there is no mac learning.
>  
> 
>  
>  
> 
> Regards,
>  
> 
> Gyan S. Mishra
> IT Network Engineering & Technology 
> Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ)
> 13101 Columbia Pike FDC1 3rd Floor
> Silver Spring, MD 20904
> United States
> Phone: 301 502-1347
> Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
> www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT
>  
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Sep 21, 2019, at 9:04 AM, Sudhin Jacob <sjacob=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
>  
> We have floated a draft for benchmarking EVPN-VPWS services. Kindly request you to have a look on it. Please let us know your feedback.
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpnvpwstest/
>  
> Regards,
> Sudhin
>  
>  
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
>  
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf..org/mailman/listinfo/bess

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email