Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane

Eric C Rosen <> Tue, 26 February 2019 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F928124408; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:16:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wqYkAKNrTwH6; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409A0129524; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:16:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id u7so6802458qtg.9; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:16:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=qPTyAMHLyPlIV32xVzfrcC2GPjCpUJM51GZms9DpmXA=; b=MUuFUnDmE04H5a90KK2VyhAw7KfhflMYAjEWf9MOrgmI8JYqXLt8NeOWDt0u3hjh73 E6xdF+7DeQFO3kPbI3jO4Fhs8cmnO5fbH32hHfrA2sDeJvlQgjVCpc13frFoYoz187dO 1kAOWvg4HpNQZT9A8MKOTdUqmSyM6cX1AtUix+SsTRwQx5fi/tYini99Nl5VWSBNLOVc IlR2ghwEqdqLs39JgEyroAqH8pZ5mROBTqQ8D2uhmyp3mANE/aniAf7zOGIFHLow5sqq Tls9gpsMErJfTLSjeQSpGN8Bb6SZD3Rs6xDYbIvMupFY86JwJmcbi8i5quEM+R+VAZQ5 bYdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=qPTyAMHLyPlIV32xVzfrcC2GPjCpUJM51GZms9DpmXA=; b=JycAzgjm0EE3zI7asHqbBcnlphcxNNXIrDO44sJMfcaTU4RxSm5H2P4lc6APKsjEQv dKe1rCCGCaxjM2GiUKTT8QFKF/af2cahaq/DYf+ag0o82ow1aMARynjAdsz+ftNj9cn9 I99x4tqmLAT4NAQeLlbmTtMWOZVzQ9+VYRJ+lWA6aQj12pHpa2NlaUJJ/sJEzo+yCPAV J07syRkvsnbU3AcQOiaVAFDJSVoAnz93+bwrEkL4eLbE48Y4Q/8Amcw35Q9FvJuy8Tkj Z2kHDc+mft1+VxpV3GOAKKOiMMm8031HAAK12keZni4pWbxGN3DIZGYRPD+Q4clucqmT RPJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubim1HO+MQOfMc5bDhR4PRf31caHoa3FgRh8CVdedKia6rI66ab vjSG405HPxl8l7SlQG3NKlc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbbtUoR5FsePplIjy76CWzrxFEgJzbEWcuKOZbh1mZ/E1BSsdoB3e8Hai2qhIhuMxifyxuOfw==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:21e2:: with SMTP id m31mr19056813qtc.44.1551204982356; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:19c:4502:90f5:fab1:56ff:fed0:7633? ([2601:19c:4502:90f5:fab1:56ff:fed0:7633]) by with ESMTPSA id u18sm3879913qka.25.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:16:21 -0800 (PST)
To:, "" <>
Cc: "" <>
References: <18744_1548075971_5C45C3C3_18744_88_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B7915D3@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Eric C Rosen <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:16:20 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <18744_1548075971_5C45C3C3_18744_88_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B7915D3@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------652AF3961FAAF7F47A8556DD"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:16:27 -0000

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR relevant to this document.

On 1/21/19 8:06 AM, wrote:
> Hello Working Group,
> This email starts a three weeks Working Group Last Call on 
>  draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane [1].
> This poll runs until *the 4th of February*.
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies 
> to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance 
> with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this Document 
> please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware 
> of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without 
> answers from all the Authors and Contributors.
> We have several IPRs already disclosed.
> If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please 
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet 
> been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].
>     Thank you,
>     Stephane & Matthew
>     [1] 
>     [2] 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list